2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Arbitrary-Lagrangian–Eulerian ADER-MOOD finite volume schemes for multidimensional hyperbolic conservation laws

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
(237 reference statements)
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the popular WENO technique has been used for the reconstruction procedure, that in the polynomial formulation presented in implies the use of seven (in 2D) or nine (in 3D) reconstruction stencils, each of them producing a reconstruction polynomial of the form () that has to be blended nonlinearly to obtain the final reconstruction polynomial boldwhn for each element Tin. On the contrary, the MOOD approach only needs one reconstruction stencil scriptSi to derive one final reconstruction polynomial boldwhn, which is used as is, that is, unlimited . The limiting procedure is carried out a posteriori as follows: at the end of each timestep, the discrete candidate numerical solution boldQi, provided by the finite volume scheme, is checked against a set of so‐called detection criteria, and if the solution does not pass the checks, then the polynomial reconstruction degree M is locally decremented and the discrete solution boldQi is computed again with a lower polynomial degree.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the popular WENO technique has been used for the reconstruction procedure, that in the polynomial formulation presented in implies the use of seven (in 2D) or nine (in 3D) reconstruction stencils, each of them producing a reconstruction polynomial of the form () that has to be blended nonlinearly to obtain the final reconstruction polynomial boldwhn for each element Tin. On the contrary, the MOOD approach only needs one reconstruction stencil scriptSi to derive one final reconstruction polynomial boldwhn, which is used as is, that is, unlimited . The limiting procedure is carried out a posteriori as follows: at the end of each timestep, the discrete candidate numerical solution boldQi, provided by the finite volume scheme, is checked against a set of so‐called detection criteria, and if the solution does not pass the checks, then the polynomial reconstruction degree M is locally decremented and the discrete solution boldQi is computed again with a lower polynomial degree.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High order of accuracy in time is then achieved using a local space‐time evolution of the reconstruction polynomials boldwhn, hence obtaining for each control volume Tin a space‐time polynomial of degree M denoted by q h ( x , t ). Such a procedure has first been developed in the Eulerian framework on fixed grids in and subsequently extended to moving meshes in the ALE context . The local space‐time Galerkin technique does not require any neighbor information and is based on an element‐local weak space‐time formulation of the governing PDE () that reads falsefalsetntn+1Ti(t)θk0.3emboldqht0.3emdboldx0.3emdt+falsefalsetntn+1Ti(t)θk0.3em·boldF(boldqh)0.3emdboldx0.3emdt=falsefalsetntn+1Ti(t)θk0.3emboldS()boldqhdboldx0.3emdt, where θ k = θ k ( x , t ) is a space‐time test function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Numerical Admissible Detection criteria are based on the Discrete Maximum Principle (DMP) with the so-called relaxed u2 criteria [DLC13,BLD15], a plateau detection and a NaN (Not-A-Number) detection. All these NAD criteria must detect spurious numerical oscillations or lethal situations but ignoring smooth extrema or too small oscillations.…”
Section: Numerical Admissible Detection Criteria (Nad)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final timestep Δt is then given by taking Δt = min (Δt C F L , Δt V ). We refer the reader to [13], where we provide all the details needed to carry on the procedure for the timestep evaluation. Figure 10 shows the density distribution as well as the mesh configuration for the Saltzman problem at four different output times.…”
Section: Ale-ader-weno (O3) Qf Ale-ader-weno (O3) Ale-ader-weno (O4) mentioning
confidence: 99%