2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.02.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct calculation of inter-particle distance in suspension by image processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also see that, at these high solid volume fractions, the difference between b using the Krieger-Dougherty matching and the optical method in Ref. [48] is relatively small, at most 11.39% for our discrete concentrations. However, it is clear that this small disparity between the values causes a large change in the effective viscosity and bulk normal stress differences, the maximum difference being in second normal stress difference at φ = 0.4.…”
Section: E Which Interparticle Distance Is Appropriate?mentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also see that, at these high solid volume fractions, the difference between b using the Krieger-Dougherty matching and the optical method in Ref. [48] is relatively small, at most 11.39% for our discrete concentrations. However, it is clear that this small disparity between the values causes a large change in the effective viscosity and bulk normal stress differences, the maximum difference being in second normal stress difference at φ = 0.4.…”
Section: E Which Interparticle Distance Is Appropriate?mentioning
confidence: 51%
“…It is notoriously difficult in experimentation to measure the mean distance between particles in a fluid suspension, and recent work has gone into its measurement. Park [48] has developed an image processing method for measuring the mean interparticle distance and applied it to two large choices of solid volume fraction φ = 0.4 and 0.5. We have taken these data points and converted them to values of the nondimensionalised cell radius.…”
Section: E Which Interparticle Distance Is Appropriate?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithms for dispersion analysis were developed to evaluate the interparticle distance as a measure of particle aggregation and coagulation in selected pH and ionic strength conditions that are relevant to waste tank storage conditions 6 . Previously, statistical simulation of freespace was implemented in MATLAB™ to evaluate agglomeration in TEM images of polymers 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, statistical simulation of freespace was implemented in MATLAB™ to evaluate agglomeration in TEM images of polymers 7 . A recent work shows SEM image analysis using threshold intensity to filter particles from the binder, and mean interparticle distances were calculated using values of multiple neighbors with Monte-Carlo iterations 6 . However, there is still a lack of coherent interparticle distance measurement of secondary electron (SE) images for the determination of interparticle distances 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The image processing applications are the application that requires a high specification computer or parallel processing techniques to speed up the processing time, especially in applications that use a complex algorithms or methods. Some publication about image processing have been reported, Park et al have implemented the direct calculation of interparticle distance in suspension by image processing using monte carlo method [1], Saleem et al explain a comparison of feature points method on multisensor images [2], Husin et al [3] on the poisonous shrimp detection system for litopenaeus vannamei using k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN) method, and Mirdanies et al [4] has also successfully implemented the multi-object object recognition software on Remote Controlled Weapon Station (RCWS) using Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) and Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF) methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%