Direct cell reprogramming for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine

Abstract

Direct cell reprogramming, also called transdifferentiation, allows for the reprogramming of one somatic cell type directly into another, without the need to transition through an induced pluripotent state. Thus, it is an attractive approach to develop novel tissue engineering applications to treat diseases and injuries where there is a shortage of proliferating cells for tissue repair. In certain tissue damage, terminally differentiated somatic cells lose their ability to proliferate, as a result, damaged tissues cannot heal by themselves. Examples of these scenarios include myocardial infarctions, neurodegenerative diseases, and cartilage injuries. Transdifferentiation is capable of reprogramming cells that are abundant in the body into desired cell phenotypes that are able to restore tissue function in damaged areas. Therefore, direct cell reprogramming is a promising direction in the cell and tissue engineering and regenerative medicine fields.In recent years, several methods for transdifferentiation have been developed, ranging from the overexpression of transcription factors via viral vectors, to small molecules, to clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and its associated protein (Cas9) for both genetic and epigenetic reprogramming. Overexpressing transcription factors by use of a lentivirus is currently the most prevalent technique, however it lacks high reprogramming efficiencies and can pose problems when transitioning to human subjects and clinical trials. CRISPR/Cas9, fused with proteins that modulate transcription, has been shown to improve efficiencies greatly. Transdifferentiation has successfully generated many cell phenotypes, including endothelial cells, skeletal myocytes, neuronal cells, and more. These cells have been shown to emulate mature adult cells such that they are able to mimic major functions, and some are capable of promoting regeneration of damaged tissue in vivo. While transdifferentiated cells have not yet seen clinical use, they have had promise in mice models, showing success in treating liver disease and several brain-related diseases, while also being utilized as a cell source for tissue engineered vascular grafts to treat damaged blood vessels. Recently, localized transdifferentiated cells have been generated in situ, allowing for treatments without invasive surgeries and more complete transdifferentiation. In this review, we summarized the recent development in various cell reprogramming techniques, their applications in converting various somatic cells, their uses in tissue regeneration, and the challenges of transitioning to a clinical setting, accompanied with potential solutions.

Tissue Engineered Materials in Cardiovascular Surgery: The Surgeon's Perspective

“…Although initial results are promising (55), future research is necessitated and there are still many obstacles to overcome before the use of these materials can become a part of the everyday practice of cardiovascular surgery (89). The use of novel cell free techniques to enhance the process of regeneration in TE include adding exosomes (90), hydrogels (91), direct (92,93), or indirect induced pluripotent stem cell reprogramming using gene editing (94,95) as well as stimulating myocardial cell division (96). Adding such strategies holds great promise in the future.…”

Novel Glial Cell Functions: Extensive Potency, Stem Cell-Like Properties, and Participation in Regeneration and Transdifferentiation

“…To reprogram cells using regulatory factors, bacterial or viral vectors are introduced into cells to cause an overexpression of key transcription factors, and thereby, initiate transdifferentiation (Patel and Yang, 2010;Grath and Dai, 2019); CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing can also employed to alter the pattern of gene expression directly (Rubio et al, 2016); or drugs that target transcription factors can be used to give rise to epigenetic remodeling (e.g., for transdifferentiation of human fibroblasts into endothelial cells, cardiac cells into skeletal myocytes, and mesenchymal stem cells into cardiomyocytes) (Naeem et al, 2013;Kaur et al, 2014;Sayed et al, 2015). Of these three approaches, the direct reprogramming of neuronal cells by introduction of lentiviral vectors that results in an overexpression of specific transcription factors is the most popular and effective, at present.…”

Strategies and Challenges to Improve Cellular Programming-Based Approaches for Heart Regeneration Therapy

“…The recent development of cell-free, cardiac-fate direct reprogramming methods offers a dual advantage of reducing scar tissue while simultaneously generating new functional CMs without passing through a pluripotent stage [ 72 ]. Unlike iPSCs, direct reprogramming methods avoid the major pitfalls of iPSCs techniques including time-consuming cell conversion, the risk of genetic abnormalities, and tumorigenesis [ 73 , 74 ]. Moreover, converting resident cardiac fibroblasts into functional CMs in situ via nonviral, direct reprogramming is another critical advantage that offers great potential for facilitating clinical-based regenerative applications.…”