2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Classification of GC × GC-Analyzed Complex Mixtures Using Non-Negative Matrix Factorization-Based Feature Extraction

Abstract: Complex chemical mixtures need to be evaluated to, for example, aid in medical diagnoses, assess product quality, and assess environmental conditions. Two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC), which is a comprehensive analytical technique, combined with data classification techniques, has attracted great interest for assessing mixtures. In this study, a nontarget cross-sample analysis-based unsupervised direct classification method using non-negative matrix factorization was developed for assessing mixture… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aside from the question of whether the exclusion of matrices matches the purpose of non-target analysis, it may be possible to reduce the number of matrices by increasing the selectivity of SBSE while changing the adsorbent and/or adding solvent, or by adding solvent extraction and certain pre-treatments. Post-data processing, which we have developed (Zushi et al, 2017(Zushi et al, , 2018, is also a potential solution.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Detectability Of Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aside from the question of whether the exclusion of matrices matches the purpose of non-target analysis, it may be possible to reduce the number of matrices by increasing the selectivity of SBSE while changing the adsorbent and/or adding solvent, or by adding solvent extraction and certain pre-treatments. Post-data processing, which we have developed (Zushi et al, 2017(Zushi et al, , 2018, is also a potential solution.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Detectability Of Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of GC × GC for environmental analysis is expected to be especially effective for simultaneous analysis of compounds with multiple isomers and analogs, such as hydroxylated polychlorinated biphenyls (HO-PCBs) (Hashimoto et al, 2010;Rezek et al, 2012) and chlorinated paraffins (Eljarrat and Barcelo, 2006;Muscalu et al, 2017), which pose environmental risks but are difficult to measure. We have been developing methods using GC × GC / ToFMS (Fushimi et al, 2012;Hashimoto et al, 2008Hashimoto et al, , 2011Ieda et al, 2019;Lješević et al, 2019;Ochiai et al, 2011) and software tools to analyze the data generated (Hashimoto et al, 2013;Zushi et al, 2013Zushi et al, , 2014Zushi et al, , 2015Zushi et al, , 2017Zushi and Hashimoto, 2018) for environmental investigations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A region of interest (ROI) refers to any region within the GC × GC–TOFMS contour image with contrasting features that could be used to classify the corresponding sample. Previously, non-negative matrix factorization was used for unsupervised direct GC × GC–TOFMS contour classification [ 27 ], but the method was unable to identify multiple ROIs within contour data and its classifier could not be customized. Furthermore, DL has not yet been used for automated multi-ROI identification, simulation, and untargeted profiling of GC × GC–TOFMS contour data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NMF has been used in the wider field of mass spectrometry, , image analysis, and acoustic analysis . Recently, NMF was applied for the deconvolution of spectra and for classification of chromatographic patterns in measurements recorded by state-of-the-art technology of GC × GC-HR-TOFMS. ,, Apart from MCR, model peak methods are implemented in the software AMDIS and ADAP-GC which were developed for analyzing GC–MS data. The model peak method first attempts to find a peak to be deconvoluted which fulfills peak criteria, such as peak height and sharpness for each ion chromatogram.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%