2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct CO2 advection measurements and the night flux problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests net assimilation of CO 2 by the forest vegetation at night, very unlikely in this ecosystem and therefore indicative of advection events, which are likely at this site under stable night-time conditions. Although there is no commonly agreed method to account for advection (Aubinet and Feigenwinter, 2010) our approach is consistent with the general logic of other methods. Other authors have recorded such errors with open-path setups (Lloyd, 2006;Hirata et al, 2007) and it is unlikely that such erroneous fluxes were caused solely by instrument error or interference by precipitation, with only 25 % of erroneous results removed by implementing LE and H thresholds for Wytham Woods data.…”
Section: Negative Night-time Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…This suggests net assimilation of CO 2 by the forest vegetation at night, very unlikely in this ecosystem and therefore indicative of advection events, which are likely at this site under stable night-time conditions. Although there is no commonly agreed method to account for advection (Aubinet and Feigenwinter, 2010) our approach is consistent with the general logic of other methods. Other authors have recorded such errors with open-path setups (Lloyd, 2006;Hirata et al, 2007) and it is unlikely that such erroneous fluxes were caused solely by instrument error or interference by precipitation, with only 25 % of erroneous results removed by implementing LE and H thresholds for Wytham Woods data.…”
Section: Negative Night-time Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…While the eddy-covariance technique measures fluxes of momentum and scalars accurately in well-mixed convective boundary layer conditions, challenges in the measurement of net ecosystem exchange in the stable nocturnal boundary layer have been reported (Aubinet, 2010;Falge et al, 2001;Goulden et al, 1996;Karipot et al, 2008;Mahrt, 1999Mahrt, , 2010Mathieu et al, 2005). One challenge that must be encountered when conducting eddy-flux measurements in a stable boundary layer is the presence of wave-like disturbances (Nappo et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One challenge that must be encountered when conducting eddy-flux measurements in a stable boundary layer is the presence of wave-like disturbances (Nappo et al, 2008). Though the properties and propagation of wave-like disturbances in the boundary layer have been extensively studied (Chimonas, 1993(Chimonas, , 1999Finnigan, 1981, 1993;Einaudi et al, 1984;Finnigan and Einaudi, 1981;Hooke et al, 1973;Nappo, 2002), scant attention has been given to the impact of waves on turbulence and turbulent fluxes (Nappo et al, 2008;Viana et al, 2009;Zeri and Sa, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sensors on the tower above the canopy cannot measure the fluxes conducted by drainage flow because the layer above the canopy is decoupled from the drainage flow by the isolating super-stable layer. This advection problem is a well-known issue that has not yet been solved using eddy-flux measurements (Goulden et al, 1996;Aubinet et al, 2003;Staebler and Fitzjarrald, 2004;Sun et al, 2007;Yi et al, 2008;Montagnani et al, 2009;Feigenwinter et al, 2010;Aubinet and Feigenwinter, 2010;Queck and Bernhofer, 2010;Tóta et al, 2012;Siebicke et al, 2012).…”
Section: Xu Et Al: Stably Stratified Canopy Flow In Complex Terrainmentioning
confidence: 99%