2014
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct collapse black hole formation from synchronized pairs of atomic cooling haloes

Abstract: High-redshift quasar observations imply that supermassive black holes (SMBHs) larger than ∼ 10 9 M ⊙ formed before z ∼ 6. That such large SMBHs formed so early in the history of the Universe remains an open theoretical problem. One possibility is that gas in atomic cooling halos exposed to strong Lyman-Werner (LW) radiation forms 10 4 − 10 6 M ⊙ supermassive stars which quickly collapse into black holes. We propose a scenario for direct collapse black hole (DCBH) formation based on synchronized pairs of pristi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
128
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
128
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Rarepeak region, which has a volume of 133.6 cMpc 3 , we find 5 synchronised pairs. Given the difference in volume our abundance is higher by a factor of approximately 5 compared to that of Visbal et al (2014b). However, the Rarepeak region represents an over-density of approximately 1.7 compared to an average region of the universe and Visbal et al were unable to account for metal enrichement in their analysis which may have a led to an over-estimate of the number density of synchronised halo candidates in that case.…”
Section: Synchronised Haloesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In the Rarepeak region, which has a volume of 133.6 cMpc 3 , we find 5 synchronised pairs. Given the difference in volume our abundance is higher by a factor of approximately 5 compared to that of Visbal et al (2014b). However, the Rarepeak region represents an over-density of approximately 1.7 compared to an average region of the universe and Visbal et al were unable to account for metal enrichement in their analysis which may have a led to an over-estimate of the number density of synchronised halo candidates in that case.…”
Section: Synchronised Haloesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…5. However, if we now use a collapse time of 10 Myr, as suggested by Visbal, Haiman & Bryan (2014), for the same J LW,crit = 30, we find: 1 halo at z = 10.1 with Z < 10 −3.5 Z , 3 regions at z = 9.00 (all with Z = 0), 6 regions at z = 8.09 (3 regions with Z = 0, and 3 regions with Z < 10 −3.5 Z ), 17 regions at z = 7.33 (7 regions with Z = 0, and 10 regions with Z < 10 −3.5 Z ). All the regions are in halos with M h > 10 8 M .…”
Section: Number Density Of Direct Collapse Regions In Chunkymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possibility is more massive BH seeds with ∼ 10 3 − 10 5 M formed by direct collapse of supermassive stars in protogalaxies (e.g., Loeb & Rasio 1994;Oh & Haiman 2002;Bromm & Loeb 2003;Begelman et al 2006;Regan & Haehnelt 2009a,b;Hosokawa et al 2012Hosokawa et al , 2013Inayoshi et al 2014;Visbal et al 2014;Inayoshi & Tanaka 2015;Chon et al 2016;Regan et al 2016a,b;Hirano et al 2017;Inayoshi et al 2018) and runaway stellar collisions (e.g., Omukai et al 2008;Devecchi & Volonteri 2009;Katz et al 2015;Yajima & Khochfar 2016;Stone et al 2017;Sakurai et al 2017;Reinoso et al 2018). Even for such heavy seeds, we need to require a high duty cycle of BH growth at the Eddington accretion rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%