2008
DOI: 10.1538/expanim.57.145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Comparison between ICSI-Mediated DNA Transfer and Pronuclear DNA Microinjection for Producing Transgenic Rats

Abstract: Production efficiency of transgenic rats was compared directly between the routine pronuclear microinjection of exogenous DNA solution (PNMI-Tg method) and the ooplasmic injection of sperm cells exposed to exogenous DNA solution (ICSI- Sciences, Okazaki, Japan Pronuclear DNA microinjection is the most convenient approach to produce transgenic animals (PNMI-Tg method). In general, the proportion of microinjected zygotes developing into transgenic offspring is <5% in rodents [1,3] and <1% in large domestic sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ICSI has been used to circumvent problems of penetration/fertilisation by the sperm. ICSI can also be used to co-inject sperm and DNA into the oocyte, as a way of achieving transgenesis, (Perry et al 1999) with similar efficiency to pronuclear microinjection; this method has proved successful not only in mice but also in rats (Hirabayashi et al 2008). This technique has been also reported to produce YAC transgenics (Moreira et al 2004) with an efficiency 10 times greater than that usually obtained by standard microinjection.…”
Section: Transgenesis By Icsimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICSI has been used to circumvent problems of penetration/fertilisation by the sperm. ICSI can also be used to co-inject sperm and DNA into the oocyte, as a way of achieving transgenesis, (Perry et al 1999) with similar efficiency to pronuclear microinjection; this method has proved successful not only in mice but also in rats (Hirabayashi et al 2008). This technique has been also reported to produce YAC transgenics (Moreira et al 2004) with an efficiency 10 times greater than that usually obtained by standard microinjection.…”
Section: Transgenesis By Icsimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embryo culture technique is not well adapted for use in rats Dann 2007 Injected DNA often results in random insertion of concatamers Hirabayashi et al 2008Popova et al 2008 (2) Microinjection using an artificial chromosome vector Cloning capacity of the chromosome vector is more than 1 Mb With this technique transgenic animals carry single or few copies of the transgene Sperm-mediated DNA transfer is based on the ability of sperm cells to bind and internalize exogenous DNA (thus, they can act as vector for exogenous DNA) and transfer it into the egg during fertilization under in vitro or in vivo conditions (Lavitrano et al 2006, Smith andSpadafora. 2005).…”
Section: Filipiak and Saunders 2006mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The production efficiency of transgenic rats by the PNMI-tg and ICSI-tg methods have been directly compared using six DNA constructs [21]. No significant difference was found in the production efficiency of PCR-positive transgenic rats between the ICSI-tg and PNMI-tg methods by a non-parametric paired t-test (p=0.22; DNA code-A 1.1 vs. 0.9%, code-B 1.3 vs. 0.2%, code-C 3.1 vs. 2.4%, code-D 1.7 vs. 0.5%, code-E 0.2 vs. 2.2%, code-F 0.2 vs. 0%, respectively).…”
Section: Successful Application To Rat Transgenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Due to the larger surface area of the sperm heads of rats compared with mice, exposure to a higher concentration of exogenous DNA may lead to excess DNA association to the sperm heads and introduction into oocytes by ICSI, which may have a toxic effect on development of oocytes derived from the ICSI-tg method.The production efficiency of transgenic rats by the PNMI-tg and ICSI-tg methods have been directly compared using six DNA constructs [21]. No significant difference was found in the production efficiency of PCR-positive transgenic rats between the ICSI-tg and PNMI-tg methods by a non-parametric paired t-test (p=0.22; DNA code-A 1.1 vs. 0.9%, code-B 1.3 vs. 0.2%, code-C 3.1 vs. 2.4%, code-D 1.7 vs. 0.5%, code-E 0.2 vs. 2.2%, code-F 0.2 vs. 0%, respectively).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%