2012 European Frequency and Time Forum 2012
DOI: 10.1109/eftf.2012.6502380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct comparison of two Cryocooled Sapphire Oscillators presenting relative frequency instability at 10<sup>&#x2212;15</sup>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best near carrier phase noise is achieved with a room temperature sapphire resonator oscillator incorporating a sophisticated electronic degenerating the noise of the sustaining oscillator stage [1]. On the other hand, the Cryogenic Sapphire Oscillator (CSO) in which the sapphire resonator is cooled near 6 K, provides a fractional frequency stability better than 1 × 10 −15 for integration times lower than 10,000 s [2,3]. The recent demonstration of a low maintenance CSO based on a pulse-tube cryocooler paves the way for its deployment in real field applications [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best near carrier phase noise is achieved with a room temperature sapphire resonator oscillator incorporating a sophisticated electronic degenerating the noise of the sustaining oscillator stage [1]. On the other hand, the Cryogenic Sapphire Oscillator (CSO) in which the sapphire resonator is cooled near 6 K, provides a fractional frequency stability better than 1 × 10 −15 for integration times lower than 10,000 s [2,3]. The recent demonstration of a low maintenance CSO based on a pulse-tube cryocooler paves the way for its deployment in real field applications [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%