2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.dark.2015.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct detection of dark matter with MadDM v.2.0

Abstract: We present MadDM v.2.0, a numerical tool for dark matter physics in a generic model. This version is the next step towards the development of a fully automated framework for dark matter searches at the interface of collider physics, astrophysics and cosmology. It extends the capabilities of v.1.0 to perform calculations relevant to the direct detection of dark matter. These include calculations of spinindependent/spin-dependent nucleon scattering cross sections and nuclear recoil rates (as a function of both e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within a given model and under well-specified assumptions, the information obtained in a collider Regions in DM mass-Z mediator mass excluded at 95% CL by a selection of ATLAS searches (from References (91, 97, 105, 108, 110, 149, 154, 161)) available as of July 2018, for two coupling scenarios. Dashed curves labeled "thermal relic" indicate combinations of DM and mediator mass that are consistent with a DM density of ωc = 0.12h 2 and a standard thermal history, as computed in MadDM for this model (163). The dotted curve indicates the kinematic threshold where the mediator can decay on-shell into DM.…”
Section: Comparison Of Collider Results With Direct and Indirect Detementioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within a given model and under well-specified assumptions, the information obtained in a collider Regions in DM mass-Z mediator mass excluded at 95% CL by a selection of ATLAS searches (from References (91, 97, 105, 108, 110, 149, 154, 161)) available as of July 2018, for two coupling scenarios. Dashed curves labeled "thermal relic" indicate combinations of DM and mediator mass that are consistent with a DM density of ωc = 0.12h 2 and a standard thermal history, as computed in MadDM for this model (163). The dotted curve indicates the kinematic threshold where the mediator can decay on-shell into DM.…”
Section: Comparison Of Collider Results With Direct and Indirect Detementioning
confidence: 52%
“…Nevertheless, it is interesting to examine the parameter regions in models that can make the link, even if in limited situations (182,183). For example, for the general simplified models discussed in Section 2.2.2, one can use programs such as MadDM and Mi-crOMEGas (163,184) to compute the DM abundance for a standard thermal relic, assuming that the interaction described by the simplified model is the one responsible for setting the relic density. Often (e.g., Figure 7), ATLAS and CMS supplement their results with contours indicating where within a model this procedure obtains the correct DM density of ωc = 0.12h 2 .…”
Section: Relic Density Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work follows the DMsimp framework [16][17][18], which provides the DM model files for event generators such as MadGraph5_aMC@NLO [19] as well as for DM tools such as micrOMEGAs [20][21][22] and MadDM [23,24]. The same framework was used previously to study the cases of s-channel spin-1 and spin-0 mediators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the plot the relic density line (see Section 4.2) calculated with the MadDM numerical tool [164] is also illustrated. This line indicates where the processes predicted by the simplified model are by themselves sufficient to explain the observed DM abundance in the universe (Ω χ = 0.12).…”
Section: Srmentioning
confidence: 99%