2015
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/10/055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct detection signatures of self-interacting dark matter with a light mediator

Abstract: Self-interacting dark matter (SIDM) is a simple and well-motivated scenario that could explain longstanding puzzles in structure formation on small scales. If the required self-interaction arises through a light mediator (with mass ∼ 10 MeV) in the dark sector, this new particle must be unstable to avoid overclosing the universe. The decay of the light mediator could happen due to a weak coupling of the hidden and visible sectors, providing new signatures for direct detection experiments. The SIDM nuclear reco… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
96
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the analysis in Ref. [47], we place the upper bound on on the dark photon 10 It follows that M * 10M R × (m ν /0. parameter from the 54 ton×day exposure of PandaX-II [48] in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the analysis in Ref. [47], we place the upper bound on on the dark photon 10 It follows that M * 10M R × (m ν /0. parameter from the 54 ton×day exposure of PandaX-II [48] in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many well-motivated DM models, the DM particles do not couple to the SM particles directly, but through some light color-singlet mediator particles, which has rich phenomenological consequences in DM annihilation [10][11][12], self-scatterings [13][14][15] and solar capture [16,17], and direct detections [18,19]. In this scenario, for the same DM mass, the resulting energy spectrum of final state particle from DM annihilation can be significantly different from the case without a mediator.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 the ε = 10 −10 contour appears for r ∞ = 10 −4 . The method used in setting the constraints from CRESST-II and LUX is given in Appendix B of [93] (also see [52,53,94]). 8 We use a similar method in deriving the constraint for CDMS-LITE, the details of which are given in the appendix.…”
Section: Direct Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct detection is discussed in Sec. 6 (providing updated constraints to [52,53]). Important caveats regarding the formation of dark atomic bound states and the reannihilation effect are explained in Sec.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%