1976
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0104(76)80007-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct determination of ion-neutral molecule interaction potentials from gaseous ion mobility measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[16][17][18][19][20] In 1981, mobility and diffusion data 9,10 for Cl − ions in Xe were used 21 to test the well depth of the potential that had been inferred from differential scattering cross sections. 14 The transport data suggested a lower bound of 0.11 eV, while the scattering data gave an upper limit of 0.14 eV; both were consistent with the value of 0.135 eV found 13 by direct inversion 23 of the mobility data, but were substantially smaller than the earlier estimate by Riveros et al 22 Also in 1981, Viehland et al 24 used existing mobility and diffusion data [7][8][9][10] for Cl − ions in Ar to check the accuracy of a Hartree-Fock potential 25 for the system and of a potential inferred from scattering measurements with ion beams. 15 The theoretical calculations were in good agreement with the transport data for values of E/n 0 , the ratio of the electrostatic a) Electronic mail: kirkpacc@slu.edu.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…[16][17][18][19][20] In 1981, mobility and diffusion data 9,10 for Cl − ions in Xe were used 21 to test the well depth of the potential that had been inferred from differential scattering cross sections. 14 The transport data suggested a lower bound of 0.11 eV, while the scattering data gave an upper limit of 0.14 eV; both were consistent with the value of 0.135 eV found 13 by direct inversion 23 of the mobility data, but were substantially smaller than the earlier estimate by Riveros et al 22 Also in 1981, Viehland et al 24 used existing mobility and diffusion data [7][8][9][10] for Cl − ions in Ar to check the accuracy of a Hartree-Fock potential 25 for the system and of a potential inferred from scattering measurements with ion beams. 15 The theoretical calculations were in good agreement with the transport data for values of E/n 0 , the ratio of the electrostatic a) Electronic mail: kirkpacc@slu.edu.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The reason for this difference is that the collision integrals are determined primarily by the characteristics of the repulsive wall of the potential [43,44] which tend to be "similar" for different states so that (2,2) * is similar for the various states. The primary difference is in the value of σ which ranges between 2.206 × 10 −10 m and 4.246×10 −10 m, a factor of less than 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complete iterative inversion techniques then gained acceptance within the scientific community. They became standard tools in the inversion of not only second virial coefficient data, but other macroscopic data such as dilute gas transport coefficients [1,10,20,21], diffusion coefficients, and thermal conductivity [8], and researchers continue to develop, use, and study related iterative inversion schemes.…”
Section: Iterationmentioning
confidence: 99%