1981
DOI: 10.1097/00007691-198102000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Determination of Propranolol in Serum or Plasma by Fluoroimmunoassay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21,22 With regard to the ability to detect low concentrations of (S)-propranolol, the improvements made here place the aqueous and organic solvent based assays using MIPs on the same level as immunoassays using biological antibodies. [34][35][36][37][38] Further work to improve the sensitivity of the aqueous assay may be based on the observation that the ratio of specific to nonspecific binding increases with increasing concentrations of ethanol and buffer (Figures 4 and 5). Hence, despite the fact that the total response is reduced, the portion that is sensitive to analyte concentration increases, which probably lead to an improvement of the overall assay performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 With regard to the ability to detect low concentrations of (S)-propranolol, the improvements made here place the aqueous and organic solvent based assays using MIPs on the same level as immunoassays using biological antibodies. [34][35][36][37][38] Further work to improve the sensitivity of the aqueous assay may be based on the observation that the ratio of specific to nonspecific binding increases with increasing concentrations of ethanol and buffer (Figures 4 and 5). Hence, despite the fact that the total response is reduced, the portion that is sensitive to analyte concentration increases, which probably lead to an improvement of the overall assay performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinically relevant plasma concentrations are in the range of approximately 3-300 nm (1-100 ng ml 21 ). [8][9][10] The inter-individual variation in response for blank plasma and samples spiked with known amounts of S-propranolol at three different concentrations was investigated. Samples were prepared using plasma drawn from six individuals (5 males and 1 female) and the inter-individual variation was found to be in the range of 3-8% (RSD).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). If an assay to detect lower concentrations of cotinine were re~uired, a separation fluorimmunoassay" L. 19 could be developed using anticotinine serum coupled to solid-phase particles and the same fluorescein-labelled cotinine. The separation step would enable the removal of sample components that interfere with the fluorescence end-point measurement, and therefore allow larger samp.le (urine or serum) volumes to be employed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The product (IV) (50 mg) was diazotised, coupled to KLH (64 mg), and the conjugate isolated using previously described methodsY Anti-cotinine serum Three mature female sheep were immunised with the cotinine immunogen by a previously described protocol. 19 …”
Section: Preparation Of Cotinine-4' -Amidoglycyl-paminophenylalaninementioning
confidence: 99%