2019
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhz139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Electrical Stimulation of Premotor Areas: Different Effects on Hand Muscle Activity during Object Manipulation

Abstract: Dorsal and ventral premotor (dPM and vPM) areas are crucial in control of hand muscles during object manipulation, although their respective role in humans is still debated. In patients undergoing awake surgery for brain tumors, we studied the effect of direct electrical stimulation (DES) of the premotor cortex on the execution of a hand manipulation task (HMt). A quantitative analysis of the activity of extrinsic and intrinsic hand muscles recorded during and in absence of DES was performed. Results showed th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported in a previous study using the same motor task, DES on PMC interferes with motor execution 12,14,15 . Does the disruption of PMC simultaneously interfere with the patients' motor awareness?…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As reported in a previous study using the same motor task, DES on PMC interferes with motor execution 12,14,15 . Does the disruption of PMC simultaneously interfere with the patients' motor awareness?…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…(1) A positive effect in altering motor execution was expected based on previous literature employing DES during the same HMt 12,14,15 . (2) A positive effect in altering the motor awareness was expected based on anatomical and functional evidence in AHP patients 2,7-9,48,49 and in healthy subjects 44,45 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The development of non-invasive functional and connectional imaging techniques has allowed for the construction of similar definitions of motor control pathways also in the human brain (Turella and Lingnau 2014 ), although these are still less clearly defined compared to evidence obtained in the macaque. Functionally distinct cortical sectors have been identified for highly skilled movement using intraoperative stimulation (Viganò et al 2019 ; Fornia et al 2020 ), and the connections have been studied using diffusion MRI tractography (dMRI) (Budisavljevic et al 2016 ; Howells et al 2018 ). Approaches measuring the spontaneous organized fluctuations of brain activity at rest (resting state functional connectivity; rs-FC) may also provide further evidence for large-scale, functionally specialized networks in the human brain (Simone et al 2020 ), although the interpretation of these networks with respect to structural connections is still not clearly defined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…if Canada of USA, country; the results were downloaded onto Brainstorm (a MATLAB toolbox; Tadel, Baillet, Mosher, Pantazis, & Leahy, 2011), obtaining a 3D-MRI reconstruction of each patient MR with all the sites marked as a scout. This was co-registered in the NMI-space [9,22,23]. In "normal"-map patients, the subdivision of the cortical hand-knob region was designed (Figure 3) based on 10 stimulated sites (1,3,5,7,9 covering the anterior region; 2,4,6,8,10 covering the posterior region); in each M1 site the cMT (absolute value/mA) at HF-To5 and HF-To2 was normalized within the subject (Z-score) to allow for a comparison between the anterior and posterior regions with each paradigm [9,22,23].…”
Section: Neurophysiological Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%