“…This effect decreases the chiral recognition. Bhushan and Agarwal [44] reported a method for direct TLC resolution and isolation of enantiomers of dl-PenA using l-tartaric acid and (R)-mandelic HPLC β 2 -Amino acids Chiral stationary phases containing quinine-or quinidine-based zwitterionic selectors UV [191] HPLC dl-Penicillamine and dl-cysteine α-Acid glycoprotein and β-cyclodextrin columns UV-231 nm [77] HPLC γ-Amino acids CSP based on (+)-(18-crown-6)-2,3,11,12-tetracarboxylic acid UV-210 nm [107] HPLC N-Fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl α-amino acids Polysaccharide-derived chiral stationary phases DAD [109] HPLC β 3 -Homo-amino acid (+)-(18-crown-6)-2,3,11,12-tetracarboxylic acid-based CSP UV-210 nm [104] HPLC Dansyl amino acids Cyclic hexapeptide as chiral selector [192] HPLC β-Amino acids (+)-(18-crown-6)-2,3,11,12-tetracarboxylic acid-based CSP [105] HPLC N-(3,5-Dinitrobenzoyl)-α-amino acids (+)-(18-crown-6)-2,3,11,12-tetracarboxylic acid-based CSP [ Polarimeter [193] acid as chiral impregnating reagent as well as CMPA. The detection limits were found to be 0.12 μg for each enantiomer of PenA with l-tartaric acid, under both the conditions, and 0.11 μg with (R)-mandelic acid.…”