Direct Evaluation of the Stress Intensity Factors for the Single and Multiple Crack Problems Using the P-Version Finite Element Method and Contour Integral Method

Abstract

Stress intensity factor (SIF) is one of three important parameters in classical linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM). The evaluation of SIFs is of great significance in the field of engineering structural and material damage assessment, such as aerospace engineering and automobile industry, etc. In this paper, the SIFs of a central straight crack plate, a slanted single-edge cracked plate under end shearing, the offset double-edge cracks rectangular plate, a branched crack in an infinite plate and a crucifix crack in a square plate under bi-axial tension are extracted by using the p-version finite element method (P-FEM) and contour integral method (CIM). The above single- and multiple-crack problems were investigated, numerical results were compared and analyzed with results using other numerical methods in the literature such as the numerical manifold method (NMM), improved approach using the finite element method, particular weight function method and exponential matrix method (EMM). The effectiveness and accuracy of the present method are verified.

Implementation of the Displacement Discontinuity Method in Geotechnical Case Studies

“…Based on this method, the theory of fracture mechanics can be directly applied to define the crack's propagation direction, which is the unique and essential parameter that requires calculation. In contrast, in finite element application processes, either the reconfiguration of the discretization mesh by using special elements [31] or the monitoring of the crack propagation path is needed to adapt the element's equations to XFEM methods [24].…”

Influence of Fatigue Crack Formation and Propagation on Reliability of Steel Members

“…State of stresses (tightness) surrounding crack tip is formulated by the stress-intensity factor (SIF) [31,32], whose value is depending on the way of stressing, size and shape of a crack and on geometry of a member. In the case of a surface crack, the model of crack propagation is more complicated than in the case of crack propagating from the edge or the embedded crack.…”