2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/6151587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Extracellular Electron Transfer of the Geobacter sulfurreducens Pili Relevant to Interaromatic Distances

Abstract: Microorganisms can transfer electrons directly to extracellular acceptors, during which organic compounds are oxidized to carbon dioxide. One of these microbes, Geobacter sulfurreducens, is well known for the “metallic-like” conductivity of its type IV pili. However, there is no consensus on what the mechanism for electron transfer along these conductive pili is. Based on the aromatic distances and orientations of our predicted models, the mechanism of electron transfer in the Geobacter sulfurreducens (GS) pil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simply manipulating the value of φ c does not lead to activity patterns consistent with observational data. This [66,116] D cyt m 2 s À 1 10 À 5 -10 À 10 (7 × 10 À 7 ) Effective diffusion coefficient Estimated from [116][117][118] A act m 2 10 À 14 -10 À 13 Redox active surface area Estimated from [108] β -0.5 Charge transfer coefficient [108] φ anode V À 0.1, + 0.24 Poised low, high anode potential [58] φ ox/red 0' V À 0.07, À 0.15 Redox-active center mid-potential [44,56] N nw,cell -1-200 (49) Number of connections per cell Estimated from [32,[108][109][110][111] Fixed concentration were imposed for all chemical species at the outer domain boundary except for CO is due to the fact that lowering biofilm resistance also increases cell activity, as a result of reduced potential loss (Figure S12C) and increased usable electric potential (φ net ) (Figure S12B). In addition, pH also further decreases near the electrode as a result of increased cell activity (Figure S12D).…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simply manipulating the value of φ c does not lead to activity patterns consistent with observational data. This [66,116] D cyt m 2 s À 1 10 À 5 -10 À 10 (7 × 10 À 7 ) Effective diffusion coefficient Estimated from [116][117][118] A act m 2 10 À 14 -10 À 13 Redox active surface area Estimated from [108] β -0.5 Charge transfer coefficient [108] φ anode V À 0.1, + 0.24 Poised low, high anode potential [58] φ ox/red 0' V À 0.07, À 0.15 Redox-active center mid-potential [44,56] N nw,cell -1-200 (49) Number of connections per cell Estimated from [32,[108][109][110][111] Fixed concentration were imposed for all chemical species at the outer domain boundary except for CO is due to the fact that lowering biofilm resistance also increases cell activity, as a result of reduced potential loss (Figure S12C) and increased usable electric potential (φ net ) (Figure S12B). In addition, pH also further decreases near the electrode as a result of increased cell activity (Figure S12D).…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dcyt m 2 s -1 10 -5 -10 -10 (7×10 -7 ) Effective diffusion coefficient Estimated from [116][117][118] kD m 4 mol s -1 10 -5 -10 5 (100) Electron transfer rate constant Estimated from Dcyt = kD[Cyttot]δ δ nm 0.7 Spatial distance between adjacent redox-active molecules [119] σ S m -1 10 -4 -10 -2 (1.5×10 -3 ) Biofilm conductivity [12,21,35,120] Anw m 2 1.26×10 -17 Cross-section area of a single pilus Calculated from dnw dnw nm 4 Diameter of a single pilus [31,32] Aact m 2 10 -14 -10 -13 Redox active surface area Estimated from [108] β -0.5 Charge transfer coefficient [108] ϕanode V -0.1, +0.24 Poised low, high anode potential [58] ϕox/red 0' V -0.07, -0.15 Redox-active center mid-potential [44,56] Nnw,cell -1-200 (49) Number of connections per cell Estimated from [32,[108][109][110][111] Fixed concentration were imposed for all chemical species at the outer domain boundary except for CO2, CO3 2-, Cytred, R-COOH, R-NH2, R-PO4H2. No flux conditions were imposed at the bulk-biofilm interface and anode surface for CO2, CO3 2-, Cytred.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The involvement of aromatic amino acids with the conductive properties of biomolecules has also been a matter of debate. Studies point to a key role of these amino acids in pilus conductivity, suggesting that the π–π stacking can contribute to the electron transfer. It is known that amino acids such as tyrosine and tryptophan have the lowest redox potentials among all of the typical amino acids, which can be the determinant factor for charge generation and transport through the hopping mechanism .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dcyt m 2 s -1 10 -5 -10 -10 (7×10 -7 ) Effective diffusion coefficient Estimated from [116][117][118] kD m 4 mol s -1 10 -5 -10 5 (100) Electron transfer rate constant Estimated from Dcyt = kD[Cyttot]δ δ nm 0.7 Spatial distance between adjacent redox-active molecules [119] σ S m -1 10 -4 -10 -2 (1.5×10 -3 ) Biofilm conductivity [12,21,35,120] Anw m 2 1.26×10 -17 Cross-section area of a single pilus Calculated from dnw dnw nm 4 Diameter of a single pilus [31,32] Aact m 2 10 -14 -10 -13 Redox active surface area Estimated from [108] β -0.5 Charge transfer coefficient [108] ϕanode V -0.1, +0. 24 Poised low, high anode potential [58] ϕox/red 0' V -0.07, -0.15 Redox-active center mid-potential [44,56] Nnw,cell -1-200 (49) Number of connections per cell Estimated from [32,[108][109][110][111] Fixed concentration were imposed for all chemical species at the outer domain boundary except for CO2, CO3 2-, Cytred, R-COOH, R-NH2, R-PO4H2.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%