2011
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct, genome-wide assessment of DNA mutations in single cells

Abstract: DNA mutations are the inevitable consequences of errors that arise during replication and repair of DNA damage. Because of their random and infrequent occurrence, quantification and characterization of DNA mutations in the genome of somatic cells has been difficult. Random, low-abundance mutations are currently inaccessible by standard high-throughput sequencing approaches because they cannot be distinguished from sequencing errors. One way to circumvent this problem and simultaneously account for the mutation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
72
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
6
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a The A]G mutation of interest (red check mark in one of the cells in the whole tissue) cannot be distinguished from the sequencing errors. b When sequencing the genome of the single cell containing the mutation (red check mark in the single cell) after whole genome amplification, the A]G mutation can now be distinguished from the sequencing errors because it shows up in approximately 50% of the reads (box), corresponding to one allele [42].…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a The A]G mutation of interest (red check mark in one of the cells in the whole tissue) cannot be distinguished from the sequencing errors. b When sequencing the genome of the single cell containing the mutation (red check mark in the single cell) after whole genome amplification, the A]G mutation can now be distinguished from the sequencing errors because it shows up in approximately 50% of the reads (box), corresponding to one allele [42].…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biases lead to uneven coverage and consequent difficulties for identifying somatic alterations, including SNVs, CNAs and structural aberrations. Sensitivity is most affected by allele dropout, owing to the preferential amplification of one of two alleles, with rates of 8 to 40% 16,18 reported. Large CNAs can still be examined with low genome coverage (e.g., 5–6%) by computing read counts in variable-sized bins 19 , whereas unequal coverage renders analysis of smaller copy number and structural variants extremely difficult.…”
Section: Sequencing Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although genome analyses at the single cell level can resolve ambiguities associated with data generated from average population, such analyses are error prone due to WGA artifacts and are also limited in the types of identifiable DNA mutations [98,99]. Researchers have been able to develop methods for paired-end sequence analysis of single cell WGA products to detect multiple classes of DNA mutation, discriminate the CNVs from allelic WGA artifacts and specify the break points and architecture of structural variants [100].…”
Section: Challenges In Single Cell Genomic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%