2016
DOI: 10.1002/cnma.201600070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Growth of 3 D Hierarchical Porous Ni3S2 Nanostructures on Nickel Foam for High‐Performance Supercapacitors

Abstract: Hierarchicaln anostructures grown on conductive 3D scaffold materials are excellent candidates for supercapacitor electrodes. Herein, we report the fabrication and electrochemical performance of 3D Ni 3 S 2 nanoporous structures directly grown on nickel foam via af acile and cost-effective one-step process using Ni foam as both the template and Ni source. An ultrahigha real capacitance of 7.25 Fcm À2 was obtained at ac urrent density of 5mAcm À2 for the nanoporous Ni 3 S 2 structures. The encouraging performan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ni 3 S 2 and Co 0.5 -Ni 3 S 2 showed retention rates of 83.7% and 95.4%, respectively, up to 1000 cycles, indicating that the core-shell structure improves the long-term electrochemical stability of the KOH electrolyte system. The optimal SC and cycling performance of the electroactive Ni 3 S 2 electrode are superior or comparable to those of previously reported Ni 3 S 2 electrodes (Table 1) [25,[64][65][66][67][68].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Ni 3 S 2 and Co 0.5 -Ni 3 S 2 showed retention rates of 83.7% and 95.4%, respectively, up to 1000 cycles, indicating that the core-shell structure improves the long-term electrochemical stability of the KOH electrolyte system. The optimal SC and cycling performance of the electroactive Ni 3 S 2 electrode are superior or comparable to those of previously reported Ni 3 S 2 electrodes (Table 1) [25,[64][65][66][67][68].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…At 1, 5, 10, 15, and 25 mV s –1 scan rates, the areal specific capacitances (ASC) of the NiF 2 @Ni NA were respectively 51, 13, 9, 7, and 5 F cm –2 , which is ascribed to a reduction in the migration speed of ions for redox reactions, as at higher scan rates and accessibility of inner active sites is limited. , Because of a high surface area and a mechanically robust adhesion with lowered interfacial resistance to the underlying Ni, the self-grown mesoporous NiF 2 @Ni NA offers more accessible sites for redox reactions compared to polished Ni and similar nanostructured electrode materials of various composition and morphologies on Ni (see Table S1 of the Supporting Information). The inner/outer surface contributions to the ASC of NiF 2 @Ni NA compared to Ni are shown in inset of Figure a, where we consistently observe a higher amount of charge (typically a factor of ∼2× greater) is stored on the NiF 2 @Ni NA (for more details see the Supporting Information Figure S3a,b). For both electrodes, at the initial potential of 0.2 V (vs Hg/HgO), the slope of 0.2 increased to 0.45 and reached 0.5 (indicating a diffusion-limited intercalative process) at potentials >0.4–0.5 V, indicating that NiF 2 @Ni NA behaves as a battery-type material (see Figure S3c,d for more details) . Taken together, the intercalation capacitive contribution was more than 90% in both electrodes, signifying its dominance in the ASC performance (Figure S3e–h, Supporting Information) with higher values obtained for the NiF 2 nanorod coating.…”
Section: Electrochemical Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Developing abundant, robust, scalable, and greener chemical routes for metal-oxides/hydroxides/carbides/nitrides/phosphides/layered double hydroxides etc., has seen some promising developments for both battery electrode materials. , We provide a comparison of recently published data on ECS application using Ni­(OH) 2 , NiO, Ni x S y , NiTe, NiSe, and so forth, electrodes, developed by simpler chemical reduction or electroless methods among others, in Figure , with further details on performance (capacitance) and related data provided in the Supporting Information, Table S1. Electrode materials grown by displacement, reduction, or electroless processes, for example, with high surface area and a strong mechanical adhesion to the underlying substrate material tend to offer better performance than metal salt or binder inspired hydrothermally/chemically grown electrodes, although much of the improvement tends to be a geometrical enhancement, rather than an intrinsic one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3h, and it is superior to earlier reports. 18,65,66 Finally, the stability performance of the FeS (A650) thin lm electrode was tested to study the GCD cyclic performance at a current rate of 0.7 mA cm −2 and a corresponding electrode attained a notable capacitance retention of 89% with a round trip efficiency of about 94% over 5000 cycles, as presented in Fig. 3i.…”
Section: Three-electrode Congurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%