Opening a tunable and sizable band gap in single-layer graphene (SLG) without degrading its structural integrity and carrier mobility is a significant challenge. Using density functional theory calculations, we show that the band gap of SLG can be opened to 0.16 eV (without an electric field) and 0.34 eV (with a strong electric field) when properly sandwiched between two hexagonal boron nitride single layers. The zero-field band gaps are increased by more than 50% when the many-body effects are included. The ab initio quantum transport simulation of a dual-gated field effect transistor (FET) made of such a sandwich structure reveals an electric-field-enhanced transport gap, and the on/off current ratio is increased by a factor of 8.0 compared with that of a pure SLG FET. The tunable and sizeable band gap and structural integrity render this sandwich structure a promising candidate for high-performance SLG FETs. NPG Asia Materials (2012) 4, e6; doi:10.1038/am.2012.10; published online 17 February 2012Keywords: density functional theory; electric field; graphene; h-BN sheet; quasiparticle correction; transport properties INTRODUCTION Despite its extremely high carrier mobility (1. 5Â10 4 cm 2 V À1 s À1 for a SiO 2 -supported sample 1 and 2Â10 5 cm 2 V À1 s À1 for a suspended sample 2,3 ), pristine graphene cannot be used for effective roomtemperature field effect transistors (FET) because of its zero band gap. Opening and tailoring a band gap in graphene is probably one of the most important and urgent research topics in the graphene research currently. A large number of methods have been developed to open a band gap in graphene, and these methods can be classified into the following two types, depending on whether they preserve the integrity of the honeycomb structure: in a type I method, the honeycomb structure is destroyed, and in a type II method, the honeycomb structure of graphene is preserved. Typical type I methods include cutting graphene into nanoribbons, 4 making graphene nanomeshes, 5 and chemical functionalization. 6,7 The main disadvantage of the type I methods is that the carrier mobility and on-state current are greatly reduced because the destruction of the honeycomb structure introduces scattering centers, enhances the carrier effective mass and produces a non-tunable band gap.Unlike the type I method, high carrier mobility can be maintained in the type II method because the honeycomb structure is maintained. Typical type II methods include graphene-substrate interaction 8,9 and the application of strain. 10 The graphene band gap induced by a substrate is not tunable. The most effective type II method is the application of an external electric field to the graphene. Both