2013
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/763/2/l32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DIRECT IMAGING DISCOVERY OF A “SUPER-JUPITER” AROUND THE LATE B-TYPE STAR κ And

Abstract: We present the direct imaging discovery of an extrasolar planet, or possible low-mass brown dwarf, at a projected separation of 55 ± 2 AU (1. 058 ± 0. 007) from the B9-type star κ And. The planet was detected with Subaru/HiCIAO during the SEEDS survey and confirmed as a bound companion via common proper motion measurements. Observed near-infrared magnitudes of J = 16.3 ± 0.3, H = 15.2 ± 0.2, K s = 14.6 ± 0.4, and L = 13.12 ± 0.09 indicate a temperature of ∼1700 K. The galactic kinematics of the host star are c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
79
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
79
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing other young (<1 Gyr) substellar companions to the cooling models in Figure 4 shows that several known objects also fall in or very close to this region: 2MASS J01033563-5515561 ABb (Delorme et al 2013), AB Pic b (Chauvin et al 2005), κ And b (Carson et al 2013), G196-3 B (Rebolo et al 1998), SDSS J224953.47+004404.6 B (Allers et al 2010), LP261-75 B (Reid & Walkowicz 2006), HD 203030 B (Metchev & Hillenbrand 2006), and HN Peg B (Luhman et al 2007). For these objects, a luminosity and age do not translate into a unique mass prediction, instead being consistent with both ≈12-14 M Jup and ≈20-26 M Jup mass tracks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Comparing other young (<1 Gyr) substellar companions to the cooling models in Figure 4 shows that several known objects also fall in or very close to this region: 2MASS J01033563-5515561 ABb (Delorme et al 2013), AB Pic b (Chauvin et al 2005), κ And b (Carson et al 2013), G196-3 B (Rebolo et al 1998), SDSS J224953.47+004404.6 B (Allers et al 2010), LP261-75 B (Reid & Walkowicz 2006), HD 203030 B (Metchev & Hillenbrand 2006), and HN Peg B (Luhman et al 2007). For these objects, a luminosity and age do not translate into a unique mass prediction, instead being consistent with both ≈12-14 M Jup and ≈20-26 M Jup mass tracks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Ages derived for early-type stars based on HR diagram measurements are extremely sensitive to rotation/ inclination effects. As shown for κ And, including rotation/ inclination effects can significantly reduce the star's estimated age and the interpretation of any imaged companions (Carson et al 2013;Jones et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainties in model-derived properties constitute the dominant systematic error for in-situ measurements of the IMF for young populations (Bastian et al 2010), determinations of star cluster ages (e.g., Preibisch et al 2001versus Pecaut et al 2012, comparison of protoplanetary disk properties to those of mature planetary systems (Andrews et al 2013), and binary formation studies (e.g., Kraus et al 2011a;Kraus & Hillenbrand 2012;Duchêne & Kraus 2013). Mass/age ambiguities strongly limit interpretations for directly imaged gas giant planets in young populations, where the host-star age and companion luminosity establish the planet mass (e.g., Lafrenière et al 2008versus Pecaut et al 2012, and also Carson et al 2013versus Hinkley et al 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%