2015
DOI: 10.1002/jps.24258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct In Vivo Human Intestinal Permeability (Peff) Determined with Different Clinical Perfusion and Intubation Methods

Abstract: Regional in vivo human intestinal effective permeability (Peff ) is calculated by measuring the disappearance rate of substances during intestinal perfusion. Peff is the most relevant parameter in the prediction of rate and extent of drug absorption from all parts of the intestine. Today, human intestinal perfusions are not performed on a routine basis in drug development. Therefore, it would be beneficial to increase the accuracy of the in vitro and in silico tools used to evaluate the intestinal Peff of nove… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
97
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 216 publications
(374 reference statements)
1
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the aforementioned assumption, the regional differences in absorption should be a product of the variable conditions along the GI tract and the variable nature of the intestinal membrane, where the differences in mSA are assumed to play a major role in defining such differences in absorption. This assumes however that the differences in the membrane composition are relatively small across the human intestine, which might not be necessary true as the small-intestinal and colon membrane have different physicochemical properties (62)(63)(64) as well as differences in the mucus layer and UWL composition (65).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under the aforementioned assumption, the regional differences in absorption should be a product of the variable conditions along the GI tract and the variable nature of the intestinal membrane, where the differences in mSA are assumed to play a major role in defining such differences in absorption. This assumes however that the differences in the membrane composition are relatively small across the human intestine, which might not be necessary true as the small-intestinal and colon membrane have different physicochemical properties (62)(63)(64) as well as differences in the mucus layer and UWL composition (65).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the elevated cost of the clinical investigation of regional human P eff , the use of animal models and in vitro systems such as the Ussing chamber combined with excised human intestinal fragments can provide a reliable alternative for such estimates (3,60,65,66,74,75). In addition, one of the main goals of the Pan-European project Oral Biopharmaceutical Tools (OrBiTo), funded by the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI), is to provide the necessary information to improve our understanding of how orally administered drugs become absorbed from the GI tract and to generate better in vitro and in silico tools that allow a better prediction of their in vivo performance (http://www.orbitoproject.eu/objectives).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can define the critical permeation number (Pn crit ) as the lowest Pn value that provides the C max and AUC ratios of more than 0.8 against the theoretically highest permeability case of Pn = 20. Pn = 20 is calculated based on the highest permeability value observed in humans ( P eff = 10 × 10 −4 cm/s for glucose) and adjusted for the average molecular weight of modern drugs (400) . Figure shows the relationship between Pn crit and T 1/2 .…”
Section: Bioequivalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drug data set used for clustering and classification analysis is presented in Table . It includes a total of 64 model drugs with diverse physicochemical and biopharmaceutical properties: (a) compounds 1–34 were adopted from the data set compiled by Dahlgren et al () for which P eff values have been determined from the intestinal perfusion studies in humans; (b) compounds 35–64 were added based on the extensive physicochemical and biopharmaceutical data reported in the respective FIP Biowaiver Monographs (2004‐2016) (https://www.fip.org/bcs_monographs).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%