2016
DOI: 10.2174/1389557515666151001141713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Inhibitors of Ras-Effector Protein Interactions

Abstract: Activating Ras mutations are associated with ~30% of all human cancers, which often respond poorly to standard therapies. The four Ras isoforms are therefore highly attractive targets for anticancer drug discovery. However, Ras proteins function through protein-protein interactions and their surfaces lack any major pockets for small molecules to bind; as a result they have been declared "undruggable" for the past 30 years. Several breakthroughs during the past few years may finally remove Ras from the list of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 Furthermore, superresolution microscopy supports the premise that RAS proteins form dimers at the plasma membrane. 17 However, these dimers were independent of the activation state of RAS and mediated by the hypervariable region. 17 Our analysis of H-RAS crystal structures reveals the presence of a unique a4-a5 dimeric structure in "active" H-RAS that is not present in "inactive" state H-RAS structures, suggesting weak propensity of the G-domain to dimerize using the a4-a5 interface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…23 Furthermore, superresolution microscopy supports the premise that RAS proteins form dimers at the plasma membrane. 17 However, these dimers were independent of the activation state of RAS and mediated by the hypervariable region. 17 Our analysis of H-RAS crystal structures reveals the presence of a unique a4-a5 dimeric structure in "active" H-RAS that is not present in "inactive" state H-RAS structures, suggesting weak propensity of the G-domain to dimerize using the a4-a5 interface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…13,14 This same hydrophobic pocket has been used to prevent RAF interaction, which led to increased apoptosis in an N-RAS-mutant (Q61K) non-small cell lung cancer line, H1299. 16,17 SOS interaction has also been targeted using a cell permeable peptide based on the RAS-interacting a-helix 1 of SOS that blocks the interaction of K-RAS with SOS1 and further prevents GTP association, resulting in inhibition of K-RAS function. 18 However, none of these antagonists possess sufficient affinity and efficacy to potently block RAS function in a therapeutically relevant setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 & 5B). 64 Interestingly, these compounds bound the same hydrophobic region as DCAI 19 and Cyclorasin 9A5, 65 but made somewhat different contacts with RAS (Fig. 5B).…”
Section: Targeting Ras:effector Interactionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…To date, there are mainly three strategies for the discovery of potent KRAS inhibitors: (1) to inhibit KRAS membrane targeting ( Laheru et al, 2012 ; Prakash and Gorfe, 2013 ; Chavan et al, 2015 ; Cox et al, 2015 ); (2) to directly target KRAS ( Wang et al, 2012 ; Cromm et al, 2015 ; Leshchiner et al, 2015 ; Brock et al, 2016 ; Trinh et al, 2016 ); (3) to inhibit interaction between KRAS and its downstream effectors ( Athuluri-Divakar et al, 2016 ; Upadhyaya et al, 2016 ; Keeton et al, 2017 ). However, there are multiple escape pathways by process of post-translation for inhibiting KRAS membrane targeting ( Rowinsky et al, 1999 ; Van Cutsem et al, 2004 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%