1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf00235558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct inhibitory synaptic linkage of pontomedullary reticular burst neurons with abducens motoneurons in the cat

Abstract: 1. Unit spikes of burst neurons were extracellularly recorded in the pontomedullary reticular formation of the cat. These neurons were identified by their burst activity coincident with the quick inhibitory phase of the contralateral abducens nerve during vestibular nystagmus and their antidromic activation from the contralateral abducens nucleus. 2. When the extracellular field potentials in and near the abducens nucleus were triggered by spikes of a contralateral burs neuron, the averaged potential consisted… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
45
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(ii) 0-2-0-5 msec of conduction time along the terminal branches in the motor nucleus and in laminae V-VI, allowing for distances of 2-5 mm and conduction velocity of 10 m/sec (see Eccles, Fatt & Landgren, 1956;Jankowska & Roberts, 1972a;Wall & Werman, 1976;Munson & Sypert, 1979) plus 0 1-02 msec of conduction time along the stem axons in the lateral funiculus, allowing for the distances of 5-10 mm in the rostrocaudal direction and 40 m/sec conduction velocity (see Czarkowska et al 1976, Hongo et al 1983b. (iii) 0-3-04 msec of synaptic delay (Eccles et al 1956;Jankowska & Roberts, 1972b;Rapoport, Susswein, Uchino & Wilson, 1977;Hikosaka, Igusa, Nakao & Shimazu, 1978;Munson & Sypert, 1978). An alternative criterion was that the latencies of the monosynaptic i.p.s.p.…”
Section: B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) 0-2-0-5 msec of conduction time along the terminal branches in the motor nucleus and in laminae V-VI, allowing for distances of 2-5 mm and conduction velocity of 10 m/sec (see Eccles, Fatt & Landgren, 1956;Jankowska & Roberts, 1972a;Wall & Werman, 1976;Munson & Sypert, 1979) plus 0 1-02 msec of conduction time along the stem axons in the lateral funiculus, allowing for the distances of 5-10 mm in the rostrocaudal direction and 40 m/sec conduction velocity (see Czarkowska et al 1976, Hongo et al 1983b. (iii) 0-3-04 msec of synaptic delay (Eccles et al 1956;Jankowska & Roberts, 1972b;Rapoport, Susswein, Uchino & Wilson, 1977;Hikosaka, Igusa, Nakao & Shimazu, 1978;Munson & Sypert, 1978). An alternative criterion was that the latencies of the monosynaptic i.p.s.p.…”
Section: B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the set of brainstem neurones projecting monosynaptically on ocular motoneurones. The main afferent inputs to ABD neurones are organized in reciprocal excitatory and inhibitory synaptic connections (Escudero & Delgado-Garcia, 1988) arising from (i) the ipsilateral excitatory (Kaneko, Evinger & Fuchs, 1981;Strassman, Highstein & McCrea, 1986a) and the contralateral inhibitory burst neurones (Hikosaka, Igusa, Nakao & Shimazu, 1978b;Yoshida, McCrea, Berthoz & Vidal, 1982;Strassman, Highstein & McCrea, 1986b), located in the pontomedullary reticular formation; (ii) the contralateral excitatory and ipsilateral inhibitory medial vestibular neurones (Baker, Mano & Shimazu, 1969;Hikosaka, Nagao & Shimazu, 1980;McCrea, Yoshida, Berthoz & 540 VESTIBULAR AND PREPOSITUS AFFERENTS TO ABDUCENS 541 Baker, 1980;Berthoz, Droulez, Vidal & Yoshida, 1989); and (iii) the ipsilateral excitatory and contralateral inhibitory prepositus hypoglossi (PH) neurones (Escudero & Delgado-Garcia, 1988;Spencer, Wenthold & Baker, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brink, Harrison, Jankowska, McCrea & Skoog, 1983) or along primary afferents (Solodkin, Jimenez & Rudomin, 1984), and recording of discharges of motoneurones, or muscles which they innervate (see e.g. Hikosaka, Igusa, Nakao & Shimazu, 1978;Fetz & Cheney, 1980). We have chosen the technique of Brink et al (1983) which was easiest to apply under our experimental conditions and is most suitable for screening the actions, if any, of single interneurones on a population of motoneurones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%