Direct instruction of inter- and intrapersonal skills for business education
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Cited by 6 publications
References 23 publications
Importance of Soft Skills in Health Sciences Students and Their Repercussion after the COVID-19 Epidemic: Scoping Review
Soft skills (SKs) are skills related to the interaction among people and their way of dealing with tasks. Increasingly valued in the workplace, they are especially relevant in health professionals due to the importance of the relationship among them and their patients and families. Given their importance, the university training of healthcare professionals must promote the development of SKs. The COVID-19 pandemic has been a turning point in many areas, changing the learning process and, even more, the use of these soft skills as a fundamental ingredient in human relationships. The aim of this study was to analyse the available evidence regarding SKs in health science students, specifically nursing students, and to describe whether there is a worsening in the development of such skills after the COVID-19 pandemic. According to the PRISMA-ScR methodology for systematic reviews, this study included articles on social skills and possible changes in these skills as a consequence of the pandemic in health sciences students The results highlight the importance of these emotional competences for future nurses, being particularly relevant for communication and emotional self-awareness and showing their influence on academic aspects, such as academic performance or mental health and coping skills. A major limitation of the present study was not considering aspects such as compassion or empathy. However, the novelty provided by this work is the analysis of the changes in SKs produced as a consequence of the pandemic. It is definitely clear that there is a need to enhance emotional intelligence, and thus soft skills, in future health professionals.
Importance of Soft Skills in Health Sciences Students and Their Repercussion after the COVID-19 Epidemic: Scoping Review
Soft skills (SKs) are skills related to the interaction among people and their way of dealing with tasks. Increasingly valued in the workplace, they are especially relevant in health professionals due to the importance of the relationship among them and their patients and families. Given their importance, the university training of healthcare professionals must promote the development of SKs. The COVID-19 pandemic has been a turning point in many areas, changing the learning process and, even more, the use of these soft skills as a fundamental ingredient in human relationships. The aim of this study was to analyse the available evidence regarding SKs in health science students, specifically nursing students, and to describe whether there is a worsening in the development of such skills after the COVID-19 pandemic. According to the PRISMA-ScR methodology for systematic reviews, this study included articles on social skills and possible changes in these skills as a consequence of the pandemic in health sciences students The results highlight the importance of these emotional competences for future nurses, being particularly relevant for communication and emotional self-awareness and showing their influence on academic aspects, such as academic performance or mental health and coping skills. A major limitation of the present study was not considering aspects such as compassion or empathy. However, the novelty provided by this work is the analysis of the changes in SKs produced as a consequence of the pandemic. It is definitely clear that there is a need to enhance emotional intelligence, and thus soft skills, in future health professionals.
E-learning is aptly a practical response to continuous learning given the surge in the use of information technology, and economic disruptions impinging on the schools. The need to shift to e-learning has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. In this regard, we sought to develop an organizational assessment instrument to internally ascertain the level of readiness of the school for sustainable e- learning in the new normal. This assessment instrument was primarily developed for the use of the Mendiola Consortium member schools in their pursuit to conduct elearning. We intended that as an internal self-assessment it can diminish the threat of failure and provide some assurance of the successful implementation of e-learning. We noted that many survey instruments had been made to assess organizational readiness as a construct for e-learning. However, it revealed that these instruments have varying limitations in validity and reliability to establish the domains of organizational readiness for e-learning. We anchored our study on the organizational readiness model developed by Schreurs and Al-Huneidi (2012) and Mercado (2002). From our review of related literature, we were able to generate seven basic dimensions of our model, namely: teacher, student, curriculum, technology, administrative support, financial support, and learning environment. We used a mixed method of qualitative and quantitative approach to come up with a validated instrument. We conducted a three-phase approach in developing the instrument. The final instrument yielded 45 items to be rated on a five-point Likert scale. For its content validity, the Item-Content Validity Index ranged from 0.91 to 0.96, while the Scale-Content Validity Index was 0.94. It has a Cronbach alpha of .975 for its reliability. ReferencesAlok , Kumar (2011). Student Evaluation of Teaching: An Instrument and a Development Process. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 226-235. http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/Aldowah, H., Ghazal, S., & Muniandy, B. (2015). Issues and challenges of using e-learning in a Yemeni Public University. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(32), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i32/92160Al-Fadhli, S. (2008). Students’ perceptions of e-learning in Arab Society: Kuwait University as a case study. E-Learning, 5(4), 418-428.https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2008.5.4.418Al-Hunaiyyan, A., Al-Huwail, N., & Al-Sharhan, S., (2008). Blended learning design: Discussion of cultural issues. International Journal of Cyber Society and Education, 1, 17-32.Aronen, R., & Dierssen, G. (2001). Improving equipment reliability through e-learning. Hydrocarbon Processing, 80(9), 47-60.Brown, J.D. (2009a). Statistics Corner. Questions and answers about testing statistics: Principal components analysis and exploratoryfactor analysis-Definitions, differences, and choices. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter. 13(1), 26-30. Also retrieved from www at http://jalt.org/test/bro_29.htmBrown, J.D. (2009b). Statistics Corner. Questions and answers about testing statistics: Choosing the Right Type of Rotation in PCA and EFA. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter. 13(2), 19-23. Also retrieved from www at http://jalt.org/test/bro_30.htmChapnick, S. (2000). Are you ready for e-learning? Learning Circuits: ASTD’s Online Magazine All About E-Learning. Retrieved May 21, 2011, from, http://www.astd.org/LC/2000/1100_chapnick.htmCoakes ,S.J (2013). SPSS: Analysis without Anguish : Version 20 for Windows .retrieved from https://www.worldcat.org/title/spssanalysis-without-anguish-version-20-for-windows/oclc/795333279.Creswell, J.W (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.Comeaux, P., & McKenna-Byington, E. (2003). Computer-mediated communication in online and conventional classrooms: Some implications for instructional design and professional development programmes. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(4), 348-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/1470329032000128387Coppola, N. W., Hiltz, S. R., & Rotter, N. G. (2002). Becoming a virtual professor: Pedagogical roles and asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(4):169-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2002.11045703Dancey,C. & Reidy,J. (2017). Statistics without Math for Psychology, 7th Ed. University of East London. Pearson.Dray, B.J., Lowenthal,P.R., Miszkiewicz, M.J., Ruiz-Primo, M.A, and Marczynski, K. (2011). Developing an instrument to assess student readiness for online learning: a validation study. Distance Education, Vol.32., No.1,29-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2011.565496El-Seoud, S., Taj-Eddin, I., Seddiek, N., El-Khouly, M., Nosseir, A. (2014). E-Learning and Students’ Motivation: A Research Study on the Effect of E-Learning on Higher Education https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264417866_ELearning_and_Students'_Motivation_AResearch_Study_on_the_Effect_of_ELearning_on_Higher_EducationEom, S., Wen, H. J. & Ashill, N. (2006). The determinants of students' perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215-235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00114.xFetaji, B., & Fetaji, M. E-learning indicators: A multi-dimensional modelfor planning and evaluating e-Learning software solutions. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 7(1), 1-28. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ867099.pdfGoh, C. F., Leong, C. H., Kasmin, K., Hii, P. K. &Tan, O. K. (2017). Student’ Experiences, Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in Elearning,13, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317229104_Students'_Experiences_Learning_Outcomes_and_Satisfaction_in_e-Learning Hameed, N., Shaikh, M. U., Hameed, F., & Shamim, A. (2016). Cultural differences in e-learning: Exploring new dimensions. https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.01359Hammond, H., Coplan, M., & Mandernach, B. J. (2018). Administrative considerations impacting the quality of online teaching. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 21(4). https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter214/hammond_coplan_mandernach214.html Haney, By. (2002). Assessing organizational readiness for E‐learning: 70 questions to ask. Performance Improvement, 41(4), 10-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140410404Hilliard, A. T. (2015). Global blended learning practices for teaching and learning, leadership, and professional development. Journal of International Education Research, 11(3), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.v11i3.9369Holt, D., & Challis, D. (2007). From policy to practice: One university’s experience of implementing strategic change through wholly onlineteaching and learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1276Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning, Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51-55. https://er.educause.edu/media/files/article-downloads/eqm0848.pdfHussein, Z. (2016). Leading to Intention: The Role of Attitude in Relation to Technology Acceptance Model in E-Learning https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050917302181Journell, W. (2012). Walk, don't run — to online learning. The Phi Delta Kappan, 93(7), 46-50. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23210004Kearsley, G. (2008). Preparing engineering faculty to teach online. Educational Technology, 48(5), 28-33. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44429605Kearsley, G. & Blomey, R. (2004) Preparing K-12 teachers to teach online. Educational Technology, 44(1), 49-52. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44428876Keengwe, J., & Kidd, T. (2010). Towards best practices in online learning and teaching in higher education. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 533-541. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol6no2/keengwe_0610.pdfKenzig, M. (2015). Lost in translation: Adapting a face-to-face course into an online learning experience. Health Promotion Practice, 16(5), 625-628. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839915588295Li-An Ho, (2009) The antecedents of e-learning outcome: An examination of system quality, technology readiness and learning behavior. Department of Educational Technology, 44(175), 581-599.Makarenko, E., & Andrews, J. (2017). An empirical review of the mental health and well-being of online instructors. The Journal of Educational Thought (JET) / Revue De La Pensée Éducative, 50(2&3), 182-199. https://doi.org/10.11575/jet.v50i2&3.44321Marek, K. (2009). Learning to teach online: creating a culture of support for faculty. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 50(4), 275-292. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40732589Masoumi, D. (2006). Critical factors for effective e-learning. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237556479.McLoughlin, C. & Oliver, R. (2000). Designing learning environments for cultural inclusivity: A case study of indigenous online learning at tertiary level. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 58-72. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1822 McQuiggan, C. (2007). The role of faculty development in online teaching’s potential to question teaching beliefs and assumptions. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 10(3). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1065614Mercado, C. A. (2008). Readiness Assessment Tool for an eLearning environment implementation. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on eLearning for Knowledge-Based Society, Bangkok.Meyer, J. & Barefield, A. (2010) Infrastructure and Administrative Support for Online Programs. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(3). https://www2.westga.edu/ ~distance/ojdla/Fall133/meyer_barfield133.html.Mohammed, P., & Mohan, P. (2011). Integrating culture into digital learning environments: Studies using cultural educational games. Caribbean Teaching Scholar, 1(1), 21-33. https://journals.sta.uwi.edu/ojs/index.php/cts/article/view/3Mulwa, A. S., & Kyalo, D. N. (2011). Mulwa, A. (2012). The influence of ICT infrastructure on readiness to adopt e-learning in secondaryschools in Kitui District, Kenya. http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/10287.Olufunmilola, O., Olafare, F. O. & Sakaba, D. (2016). Individual and technological factors affecting undergraduates’ use of mobile technology in University of Ilorin, Nigeria. Digital Education Review, 29, 124-133.Piña, A. (2017). An organizational development framework for assessing readiness and capacity for expanding online education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 20(3). https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall203/pina203.htmlRogers, D. L. (2000). A paradigm shift: Technology integration for higher education in the new millennium. AACE Journal, 1(13), 19-33.Ruth, S. (2006). E-learning: A financial and strategic perspective. Educause Quarterly, 1, 22-30.https://er.educause.edu/media/files/article-downloads/eqm0615.pdfSalac, R. A., & Kim, Y. S. (2016). A study on the internet connectivity in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Business Review, 1(1), 67-88. https://doi.org/10.20522/APJBR.2016.1.1.67Santagata, R., & Sandholtz, J. H. (2019). Preservice Teachers’ Mathematics Teaching Competence: Comparing Performance on Two Measures. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(5), 472–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117753575Saunders, B. & Quirke, P. (2002). Let my laptop lead the way: A Middle Eastern study. Educational Technology and Society, 5(1), 1436-4522.Saunders, M.N.K., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business (8th ed.). Pearson Education.Schreurs, J., & Al-Huneidi, A. M. (2012). E-Learning readiness in organizations: Case KBC Bank. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (iJAC), 5(1), 4-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijac.v5i1.1885Shea, P., Pickett, A., & Li, C. S. (2005). Increasing Access to Higher Education: A study of the diffusion of online teaching among 913 college faculty. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v6i2.238Sife, A. S., Lwoga, E.T., & Sanga, C. (2007). New technologies for teaching and learning: Challenges for higher learning institutions in developing countries. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 3(2), 57-67.Soriano, G.P. (2020). Psychometric Properties of Spiritual Index of Well-Being Among Filipino Women with Breast Cancer. Belitung Nursing Journal, 6(5),177-181 https://belitungraya.org/BRP/index.php/bni/indexSun, J., & Wang, Y. (2014). Tool choice for e-learning: Task-technology fit through media synchronicity. Information Systems Education Journal (ISEDJ), 12(4), 17-28. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1140775.pdfTwigg, C. A. (2011). Innovations in online learning innovations in online learning moving beyond no significant difference. In the Pew Symposia in Learning and Technology, Phoenix Arizona. https://www.immagic.com/eLibrary/ARCHIVES/GENERAL/RPI_US/R011107T.pdfTubaishat, A., Bhatti A., & El-Qawasmeh E. (2006). ICT experiences in two different Middle Eastern Universities. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 3. 667-678. https://doi.org/10.28945/3036Tularan, G., Michisella, P. (2018). Traditional vs. Non-Traditional Teaching and Learning Strategies-the case of E-learning https://www.cimt.org.uk/ijmtl/index.php/IJMTL/article/view/21Villar, L., & Alegre, O. (2006). An innovative junior faculty online development programme. E–Learning, 3(4), 599-612. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2006.3.4.599Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2007). Predictors for student success in an online course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 71-83. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.10.2.71Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801Zhu, C. (2012). Student satisfaction, performance, and knowledge construction in online collaborative learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 127-136. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.15.1.127
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
Contact Info
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Product
Resources
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.
