1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf01294971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct mass measurements of the neutron-rich isotopes of chlorine through iron

Abstract: Direct mass measurements of up to 6 isotopes for each of the elements chlorine through iron (over 35 masses) have been performed using the Time-of-Flight Isochronous (TOFI) spectrometer. We have used these measurements to: (1) investigate the local dependence of neutron and proton pairing energies on neutron excess, (2) find a new region of enhanced binding centered around S3Sc, and (3) evaluate the predictive capabilities of several mass models.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

6
24
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The previous 62 Mn mass excess (in AME2003) of −48040(220) keV was the average value from three experiments by the TOFI group [44][45][46]. Our mass excess value is −48180.8(2.6) keV and agrees with the average of the previous measurements but with two orders of magnitude reduced uncertainty.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The previous 62 Mn mass excess (in AME2003) of −48040(220) keV was the average value from three experiments by the TOFI group [44][45][46]. Our mass excess value is −48180.8(2.6) keV and agrees with the average of the previous measurements but with two orders of magnitude reduced uncertainty.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Due to its small uncertainty, the ISOLTRAP value is taken as the new tabulated mass. 61 Mn Previously, the mass of 61 Mn was measured in three experiments by the TOFI group at Los Alamos [44][45][46], with the average giving the mass excess value of −51560(230) keV. The ISOLTRAP measurement yields a value of −51741.9(2.3) keV, in agreement with the previous value but two orders of magnitude more precise.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations