2003
DOI: 10.1021/la0340504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Measurement of Thermoelastic Properties of Glassy and Rubbery Polymer Brush Nanolayers Grown by “Grafting-from” Approach

Abstract: We report the results of atomic force microscopy (AFM) based nanoscale probing of thermal and nanomechanical properties of relatively thick (50-90 nm) polymer brush layers from poly(styrene-co-2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorostyrene) (PSF) and polymethylacrylate (PMA). These layers, with a high density of grafting, are synthesized according to a "grafting-from" approach on a silicon surface modified with a reactive self-assembled monolayer. In the dry state, glassy and rubbery brush layers are found to be homogeneous mat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, stiffness measurements have been exploited to characterize heterogeneity in thin film blends of polystyrene and polybutadiene [288,289] and in polymer brush layers from poly(styrene-co-pentafluorostyrene) and polymethylacrylate [290]. In this last study the temperature dependence of the elastic response of polymer brushes also is addressed, showing that changes in the elastic behavior of the polymer sample, probed through force-displacement curves, can be exploited to determine the glass transition temperature of the polymer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, stiffness measurements have been exploited to characterize heterogeneity in thin film blends of polystyrene and polybutadiene [288,289] and in polymer brush layers from poly(styrene-co-pentafluorostyrene) and polymethylacrylate [290]. In this last study the temperature dependence of the elastic response of polymer brushes also is addressed, showing that changes in the elastic behavior of the polymer sample, probed through force-displacement curves, can be exploited to determine the glass transition temperature of the polymer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20] Similar elastic moduli were observed by AFM nanoindentation in the case of poly(styrene-co-2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorostyrene) and poly(methylacrylate). [22] As the brush height is often limited to several tens of nanometers, substrate effects may play a role in the determination of the elastic moduli by atomic force microscopy (AFM) nanoindentation. As a rule of thumb, penetrations should be limited to 10% of the film thickness to avoid this effect, although up to 35% can be reached for the combination of a soft film on a stiff substrate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 A similar result has also been observed on the poly(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl methacrylate)-block-polyacrylamide brush surface on flat silicon wafer by Wang et al 20 Tsukruk et al prepared thick (50-90 nm) poly(styrene-co-PFS) brush to investigate the thermal and mechanical properties of the brush surface by AFM-based techniques using a thermal probe. 21 In this paper, we prepared the PFA-C 8 brush thin films with a thickness of 4-50 nm by surface-initiated ATRP to analyze the molecular aggregation states of PFA-C 8 brush thin films with R f groups by contact angle measurements, WAXD, X-ray reflectivity (XR), and in-plane and out-of plane GIXD. This research will demonstrate the relationship between the brush thickness and the molecular aggregation state of R f groups to show the gradient structure along with the distance from the outermost brush surface to the migrated substrate interface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%