1976
DOI: 10.1128/aac.9.5.861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Method to Determine the Antibiotic Susceptibility of Rapidly Growing Blood Pathogens

Abstract: Standardized direct disk diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing on monomicrobial blood cultures is compared with the Food and Drug Administration method. The direct method yields acceptable data and may conserve 24 h in reporting results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that an inoculum of 0.03 ml of uncentrifuged blood culture fluid yielded acceptable results. Similarly, Wegner et al (5) observed excellent agreement between the results of direct and standardized disk diffusion tests when 0.01 ml of positive blood culture fluid was inoculated into 2 ml of Columbia broth, incubated at 37°C for 4 to 6 h, adjusted to a turbidity equivalent to a 0.5 BaSO4 McFarland standard with saline, and then used to inoculate susceptibility test plates. Although the inoculum size used in the present study (i.e., 0.05 ml of blood culture fluid) differed from those used by Fay and Oldfather (2) and Wegner et al (5), the level of agreement between direct and standardized test results was comparable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…They found that an inoculum of 0.03 ml of uncentrifuged blood culture fluid yielded acceptable results. Similarly, Wegner et al (5) observed excellent agreement between the results of direct and standardized disk diffusion tests when 0.01 ml of positive blood culture fluid was inoculated into 2 ml of Columbia broth, incubated at 37°C for 4 to 6 h, adjusted to a turbidity equivalent to a 0.5 BaSO4 McFarland standard with saline, and then used to inoculate susceptibility test plates. Although the inoculum size used in the present study (i.e., 0.05 ml of blood culture fluid) differed from those used by Fay and Oldfather (2) and Wegner et al (5), the level of agreement between direct and standardized test results was comparable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Rapid techniques for testing the susceptibilities of organisms in blood cultures include the direct disk diffusion test (3,4,9,11,16) and automated or semiautomated instrument systems. Direct disk diffusion susceptibility testing of the organisms in positive blood cultures has been shown to be reliable for most microorganisms and antimicrobial agents (4,6,16,24); this technique can save 18 to 24 h compared to the times required for the standardized protocols. Additional time savings can be obtained by early reading (6 to 10 h) of the plates after direct incubation (1,12,13); however, the test accuracy is sacrificed and some plates may not be readable due to limited bacterial growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an effort to shorten the time required to obtain antibiotic susceptibility data on blood culture isolates, turbid blood broths have been directly inoculated into susceptibility testing systems. The direct inoculation procedure compared with the conventional method was shown to be accurate for disk diffusion (3,6,9) and agar dilution (5) methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%