2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct methods for detection of protein S-nitrosylation

Abstract: S-Nitrosylation of protein cysteine residues is known to be an important mechanism for nitric oxide signaling. However, the detection of protein S-nitrosylation is still challenging due to technical limitations of current methods. This article provides a brief review on recent developments of methods, which directly target S-nitroso moieties for detection. We also describe in detail the protocol of an organophosphine-based biotin labeling of protein S-nitroso moieties.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An analysis of a wide variety of RSNO measurement techniques, including the biotin switch, has established that artifacts are common when measuring RSNOs and it is not always possible to identify which thiols have been S-nitrosated (Giustarini et al, 2003). Newer techniques have become available in recent years (Chen et al, 2013; Devarie-Baez et al, 2013), such as tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) of S-nitrosated protein thiols (Murray et al, 2012; Ulrich et al, 2013), that are highly quantitative. Beyond the problem of quantitation, it has been proposed that other thiol modifications such as dithiol/disulfide exchange, S-glutathionylation, and oxidation, may affect signaling more readily than do RSNOs (Lancaster, 2008), and should be investigated along with S-nitrosation.…”
Section: Gsnor: Health and Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis of a wide variety of RSNO measurement techniques, including the biotin switch, has established that artifacts are common when measuring RSNOs and it is not always possible to identify which thiols have been S-nitrosated (Giustarini et al, 2003). Newer techniques have become available in recent years (Chen et al, 2013; Devarie-Baez et al, 2013), such as tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) of S-nitrosated protein thiols (Murray et al, 2012; Ulrich et al, 2013), that are highly quantitative. Beyond the problem of quantitation, it has been proposed that other thiol modifications such as dithiol/disulfide exchange, S-glutathionylation, and oxidation, may affect signaling more readily than do RSNOs (Lancaster, 2008), and should be investigated along with S-nitrosation.…”
Section: Gsnor: Health and Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with the MALDI source the peptides bearing this mass addition are decomposed upon laser ionization, which makes their identification difficult (Kaneko and Wada, 2003 ). The ESI source is most commonly used to probe this mass increase and has been addressed in some recent reviews (Foster, 2012 ; Chen et al, 2013 ; Devarie-Baez et al, 2013 ; Chicooree et al, 2014 ). For instance, peroxiredoxin II E (PrxII E) was shown to undergo S-nitrosylation in A. thaliana leaves infected with an avirulent strain of the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv.…”
Section: Identification Of Plant S-nitrosylated Proteins: Methodologimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there is still a great need to develop novel chemo-selective SNO labeling reagents to facilitate specific labeling and for more effective enrichment and profiling of SNOs in complex samples. 125, 126 Similarly, the development of dimedone-based probes is another example of a method which enables specific detection of SOH-modified proteins even at the proteome level. 5093 As with the case for SNO, the overall sensitivity for detecting endogenous levels of SOH modifications is still quite low and a large amount of starting material (e.g., 30 mg) is necessary.…”
Section: Perspective and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%