1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf01231331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct methods for primary decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
118
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
118
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a large literature on the problem of finding the radical ideal √ I of an ideal I; see, e.g., [3], [8], [17], [18], [22]. In the zero-dimensional case the problem is considered to be well-solved, e.g., via the following method of Seidenberg [35]: √ I = I ∪ {q 1 , .…”
Section: Laas-cnrs Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a large literature on the problem of finding the radical ideal √ I of an ideal I; see, e.g., [3], [8], [17], [18], [22]. In the zero-dimensional case the problem is considered to be well-solved, e.g., via the following method of Seidenberg [35]: √ I = I ∪ {q 1 , .…”
Section: Laas-cnrs Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A basis of this ideal can be computed over any computable field using Gröbner bases [5, Section 4.4]. Then, the generators of the associated primes of the ideal can be computed over any computable field with the splitting algorithm [6]. If there is only one associated prime, the ideal is prime.…”
Section: Basic Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a direction application of [14]. This ideal division (I : J(I)) can be computed by classical algebraic techniques, such as Gröbner bases [10].…”
Section: The Polar Varietymentioning
confidence: 99%