2018
DOI: 10.1088/1361-651x/aac616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct numerical simulation of mechanical response in synthetic additively manufactured microstructures

Abstract: Additive manufacturing (AM) processes for metals can yield as-built microstructures that vary significantly from their cast or wrought counterparts. These microstructural variations can in turn, have profound effects on the properties of a component. Here, a modeling methodology is presented to investigate microstructurally-influenced mechanical response in additively manufactured structures via direct numeral simulation. Three-dimensional, synthetic voxelized microstructures are generated by kinetic Monte Car… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The texture-aware solidification (TS) Potts model approach is derived from the classical grain growth Monte Carlo (MC) Potts model (Ref [24][25][26], and the use of Potts models for simulation of AM parts by Rodgers et al (Ref 27,28). The grain growth Potts model is an energy minimization approach that is able to accurately simulate curvature-driven grain growth (Ref 24).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The texture-aware solidification (TS) Potts model approach is derived from the classical grain growth Monte Carlo (MC) Potts model (Ref [24][25][26], and the use of Potts models for simulation of AM parts by Rodgers et al (Ref 27,28). The grain growth Potts model is an energy minimization approach that is able to accurately simulate curvature-driven grain growth (Ref 24).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the module is suspended in the ECMs in the initial state, it is very important to adjust the parameters of microflow on the module in order to have the module threaded through the microneedle accurately and quickly [ 24 , 25 ]. Figure 2 b indicates the force exerting on the module by microflow during the assembly process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the above assembly methods do not have enough assembly force to guarantee the stability and consistency of each assembly process, and also cannot arrange microstructures spatially and cannot achieve collective assembly for anisotropic microstructures, leading to low assembly efficiency and increased failure rate. Although the physical push can provide larger force to manipulate the microstructures and keep them regularly on the microneedle, the physical push cannot flexibly adjust the contact force and the biomaterial to fabricate the microstructures are very fragile, easily damaged when the micromanipulator contacts to them [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. Thus, a more efficient method to implement the fluidic-based assembly process is proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method has been described extensively in previous publications, and the reader is referred to these works for further details. 13,[27][28][29] After the generation of stochastic volume elements (SVEs) with AM microstructures in SPPARKS, the SVEs were assigned a crystallographic texture. First, the ''uniformODF'' and ''fi-breODF'' functions of the MTEX MATLAB toolbox 30 were used to generate uniformly random and fiber orientation distribution functions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%