2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105(01)00196-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct numerical simulation of the transitional separated fluid flows around a sphere and a circular cylinder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such pattern is still unchanged at Re = 200 as depicted in Fig. 4 and reported in Gushchin et al (2002) in which the first instabilities occur within 275 < Re < 295. It is important to mention that the streamlines deviate correctly from the sphere, as a result of the l 2 norm below 10 -2 for all Reynolds numbers simulated.…”
Section: Figure 2 Computational Mesh (Eulerian Domain)supporting
confidence: 65%
“…Such pattern is still unchanged at Re = 200 as depicted in Fig. 4 and reported in Gushchin et al (2002) in which the first instabilities occur within 275 < Re < 295. It is important to mention that the streamlines deviate correctly from the sphere, as a result of the l 2 norm below 10 -2 for all Reynolds numbers simulated.…”
Section: Figure 2 Computational Mesh (Eulerian Domain)supporting
confidence: 65%
“…The steady flows for 200 Re d 270 are characterised by the existence of non-zero lift/side and torque moment coefficients (see (Magarvey and Bishop, 1961), (Johnson and Patel, 1999), (Gushchin et al, 1998(Gushchin et al, , 2001(Gushchin et al, , 2002). (Sakamoto and Haniu, 1990) give a Strouhal number range of 0.150-0.165 and the numerical result (Johnson and Patel, 1999) gives the value of 0.137 for Strouhal number.…”
Section: D Visualization Of the Flow Around A Spherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this investigation the cylindrical coordinate system (O-type grid) is used: x = R cosT, y = R sinT, z = z , where x, y, z are streamwise, lift and spanwize directions, accordingly. From the methodical calculations for 2D circular cylinder (see (Gushchin et al, 2002)) the following conclusions were made: for moderate Reynolds numbers (100 d Re d 400) the grid in radial and circumferential directions should be at least 180 x 180 or 240 x 240, the number of the points in the boundary layer can be taken not less than 5, the location of the outer boundary 23.78d with usual ( =(1,0,0)) or non-reflecting boundary conditions is sufficient to see the effects in the near wake region (0.5d < x < 10d) (d is the diameter of the cylinder). The set of the 3D calculations for the optimal flow parameters (grid size (r, T, z) -240x240x72, 10 points in the boundary layer, location of the outer boundary -23.78d, the length of the cylinder -L=7.5d) was executed for Re=220,240,260,280,300,320,340,360,400.…”
Section: The Visualization Of the Vortex Structures In The Wake Of A mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The efficiency of the method SMIF and the greater power of supercomputers make it possible adequately to model the 3D separated incompressible viscous flows past a sphere (Figure 1b-d) and a circular cylinder ( Figure 2) at moderate Reynolds numbers [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] and the air, heat and mass transfer in the clean rooms [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%