2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct numerical simulation of turbulent wake behind a surface-mounted square cylinder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
33
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This value is relatively larger than its counterpart in the 2D scenario in view of that Re cri-2D = 30-60 (Breuer et al 10 ), Re cri-2D < 70 (Okajima 53 ), and Re cri-2D = 54 (Klekar and Patankar 54 ). The value of S t falls in S t = [0.100, 0.123], being in accordance with the numerical results of Wang and Zhou 1 (AR = 7, Re = 9300, and St = 0.110), Saeedi et al 12 (AR = 4, Re = 12 000, and St = 0.106), and Bourgeois et al 3,45 (AR = 4, Re = 12 000, and St = 0.100 ± 0.003). When it comes to the types of mean streamwise vortices and the spanwise vortexshedding model (serving as the two main innovations of this paper), various kinds of vortex structures exist in the range of the Re considered in this study, which will be detailed in Sec.…”
Section: Validation and Grid Convergencesupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This value is relatively larger than its counterpart in the 2D scenario in view of that Re cri-2D = 30-60 (Breuer et al 10 ), Re cri-2D < 70 (Okajima 53 ), and Re cri-2D = 54 (Klekar and Patankar 54 ). The value of S t falls in S t = [0.100, 0.123], being in accordance with the numerical results of Wang and Zhou 1 (AR = 7, Re = 9300, and St = 0.110), Saeedi et al 12 (AR = 4, Re = 12 000, and St = 0.106), and Bourgeois et al 3,45 (AR = 4, Re = 12 000, and St = 0.100 ± 0.003). When it comes to the types of mean streamwise vortices and the spanwise vortexshedding model (serving as the two main innovations of this paper), various kinds of vortex structures exist in the range of the Re considered in this study, which will be detailed in Sec.…”
Section: Validation and Grid Convergencesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The reasons will be given in the following. The transverse instantaneous tip vortex has been observed by Saeedi et al 12 and Hwang and Yang; 18 however, no such kind of vortex-shedding is observed in this study, which may be attributed to the much lower Re values considered here. The streamwise instantaneous tip vortices are identified by investigating the vorticity field, being consistent with the observations of Roh and Park, 38 Hain et al, 40 Krajnovic, 5 and Park and Lee, 17,39 but, this type of vortex quickly vanishes along the streamwise direction (being visible only when X/D ≈ 1-3 in Figs.…”
Section: Physical Model Of Vortex-sheddingcontrasting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CFDSC 2012 Challenge aimed at evaluating the respective merits and stages of development of the different computational techniques: direct numerical simulation (DNS), large eddy simulation (LES) and Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) models. This study is an extension of our DNS analysis presented in the Challenge by Malm et al [10] Some other relevant contributions were the assessment of vortical structures in the wake with LES by Shademan et al, [11] the evaluation of the impact of the incoming boundary layer state carried out with LES by Chen et al [12] and the compilation of turbulent statistics performed with DNS by Saeedi et al [13] The most widely used approach in industry is RANS due to its relative simplicity and reduced computational cost, although some standard RANS models are known to fail when computing geometries relatively different from the ones for which they were calibrated. [14] For instance, Wilcox [15] showed that the commonly used two-equation k − ε model originally proposed by Launder and Spalding [16] performed well under ZPG TBL configurations, but failed when predicting boundary layers subjected to adverse pressure gradients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A "tall cube" with aspect ratio 4 was simulated been by Saedi et.al. [60] at Re b = 12K where b indicates the base width. The building-like obstacle was subjected to an incident turbulent boundary layer of δ 99 = 0.18h.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%