2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.11.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct numerical simulation of two-phase flow: Effective rheology and flow patterns of particle suspensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shear heating increases with solid fraction probably because (1) the average stress in the aggregate increases with solid fraction, and (2) at high solid fractions, local strain rates are considerably greater than the applied background strain rate [ Deubelbeiss et al , 2010]. Similar to simulations in which strain rate is varied, viscosities decrease with increasing strain (Figure 7c).…”
Section: Effective Aggregate Rheology In 2‐d Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Shear heating increases with solid fraction probably because (1) the average stress in the aggregate increases with solid fraction, and (2) at high solid fractions, local strain rates are considerably greater than the applied background strain rate [ Deubelbeiss et al , 2010]. Similar to simulations in which strain rate is varied, viscosities decrease with increasing strain (Figure 7c).…”
Section: Effective Aggregate Rheology In 2‐d Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The Lagrangian FE method yields accurate results for our problem configuration [ Deubelbeiss and Kaus , 2008] and has been successfully applied in an earlier study dealing with particle suspensions [ Deubelbeiss et al , 2010]. Tracers are employed to track material properties.…”
Section: Governing Equations Numerical Method and Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidently, all three sources of error decrease as the viscosity contrast increases, but assessing the viscosity contrast needed to accurately capture a given problem is unclear. Deubelbeiss et al [2010] argue that the test performed by Schmid and Podladchikov [2003] indicates that a viscosity contrast of three orders of magnitude is sufficient to prevent viscous deformation in the solid phase. However, Schmid and Podladchikov [2003]study only an isolated viscous inclusion, and the viscosity contrast needed to prevent unrealistic fluid‐like behavior in the solid phase probably also depends on the crystal fraction and the collision mode.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reference state must be defined in terms of a tensor invariant (specifically some form of the second invariant, as a measure of the magnitude of the deviatoric component) and could be defined in terms of a state of stress or, as is generally done, strain rate [e.g., Gilormini and Montheillet , 1986; Gilormini and Germain , 1987; Schmalholz et al , 2008]. We also chose strain rate, with the effective viscosity given by [see Deubelbeiss et al , 2010, Appendix A] where μ 0 is the reference viscosity at the reference strain rate E 0 , and n is the power law stress exponent. The “effective strain rate,” E , is defined as [e.g., Ranalli , 1995, equation 4.20], which, for incompressible behavior, is the square root of the second invariant of the deformation rate tensor D , with components of D given by where v i are the velocity components and x i are the material coordinates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%