2004
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.93.037206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Observation of a Bulklike Spin Moment at theFe/GaAs(100)4×

Abstract: We have used x-ray magnetic circular dichroism, which offers a unique capability to give element specific information at submonolayer sensitivity, to determine the spin and orbital magnetic moments at the Fe/GaAs(100) interface. The wedge samples, grown by molecular beam epitaxy at room temperature, consisted of 0.25-1 monolayer (ML) Fe on GaAs(100)-4x6 capped with 9 ML Co and have shown Fe spin moments of (1.84-1.96)micro(B) and a large orbital enhancement. Our results demonstrate unambiguously that the Fe/Ga… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
36
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They find that the spin magnetic moment of the Co marker layer is highest in the center of the film, and drops at both the GaAs and vacuum interfaces. A large enhancement in the orbital magnetic moment is again found close to the interface with GaAs(001), as was found by Claydon et al 96 . As the films employed by both groups were deposited onto the GaAs(001)-(4×6) surface, the reason for the discrepancy in behaviour of the interfacial spin magnetic moment is unknown, and may again be related to a different behaviour of Co and Fe atomic species at the interface with GaAs(001).…”
Section: Ferromagnet/semiconductor Interface Magnetismsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They find that the spin magnetic moment of the Co marker layer is highest in the center of the film, and drops at both the GaAs and vacuum interfaces. A large enhancement in the orbital magnetic moment is again found close to the interface with GaAs(001), as was found by Claydon et al 96 . As the films employed by both groups were deposited onto the GaAs(001)-(4×6) surface, the reason for the discrepancy in behaviour of the interfacial spin magnetic moment is unknown, and may again be related to a different behaviour of Co and Fe atomic species at the interface with GaAs(001).…”
Section: Ferromagnet/semiconductor Interface Magnetismsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Indeed, for many years, suggestions were made that the interfacial magnetic dead-layer found in Fe/GaAs(001) structures may not, in-fact, be an intrinsic feature of the interface between Fe and GaAs(001). The first demonstration that it is possible for an Fe film to possess its full magnetic moment right up to the interface with GaAs(001) was provided by Claydon et al 96 using x-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) spectroscopy 97 . They deposited thin Fe films (0.25 -18 ML) where the thinnest films were buried below Co in order to remain ferromagnetic.…”
Section: Atomic Arrangement At the Ferromagnet/semiconductor Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 It is worth noting that not only the nanoscale full epitaxial Fe 3 O 4 /MgO (100) heterostructure exhibits considerably large m orb , its total moment (m total ) also retains ∼ 70% of the bulk value. The deviation of the magnetic moment of thin films from the bulk-like Fe 3 O 4 is usually attributed to three forms of missing compensation or symmetry breaking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the results of previous work, 10 the determination of the Curie temperature for a 53 nm film to be at 620 K and that of a bulk value to be at 694 K, 9 the Curie temperatures of Co 2 MnGa thin films are thought to be well in excess of 300 K when compared to M͑T͒ results for the similar alloy Co 2 MnSi. 22 Given this expectation, and our understanding of the behavior of full metallic films which demonstrate bulklike moments down to ϳ6.5 Å, 23 it is rather surprising that the measured quantities compare so differently. Furthermore, the ratio of the Mn to Co moment should not have a strong temperature dependence, and thus, it would be close to the theoretically predicted value of 5.8 if there is a large magnetic moment transfer from Co to Mn.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%