2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.89.207002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Observation of the Transition from the Conventional Superconducting State to theπState in a Controllable Josephson Junction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
57
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a fine structure of the Josephson current inversion has been observed experimentally in long SNS junctions. 11 At very large interface resistance, γ ≫ 1, this fine structure becomes irresolvable because of in this limit the phase dependence in I s (E, φ) for relevant energies is given by a prefactor sin φ, and therefore the compensation effect appears simultaneously at all phases. 17 …”
Section: Nonequilibrium Josephson Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such a fine structure of the Josephson current inversion has been observed experimentally in long SNS junctions. 11 At very large interface resistance, γ ≫ 1, this fine structure becomes irresolvable because of in this limit the phase dependence in I s (E, φ) for relevant energies is given by a prefactor sin φ, and therefore the compensation effect appears simultaneously at all phases. 17 …”
Section: Nonequilibrium Josephson Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11,12 The non-equilibrium Josephson effect has been first predicted 4 and then theoretically studied in the ballistic junctions. 2,13,14,15 Non-equilibrium population of the Andreev states 16 induced by the current injection leads to a full-scale variation of the Josephson current with the applied voltage and to the inversion of the current direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This quantity makes evident the link between Andreev physics and the Josephson effect. It has seldom been discussed in the literature 8,[34][35][36][37] and, to the best of our knowledge, has never been directly connected to the DOS. We propose here the heuristic definition J S (E, ϕ) = −(1/φ 0 ) E 0 (∂DOS/∂ϕ) ( , ϕ) d , which can easily be checked as being correct in the case of a set of discrete ABS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under certain conditions, the CPR of the junction͑s͒ is not a simple sine, but it can contain higher harmonics: I s ͑ ͒ = ͚ n I c ͑n͒ sin n , where the coupling coefficients I c ͑n͒ quantify the relative strength of processes with a coherent transfer of n Cooper pairs. 1 In some cases, the first order coefficient I c ͑1͒ can even vanish, for instance, in asymmetric 45°grain boundary junctions in d-wave symmetry superconductors, 2,3 in out of equilibrium superconductornormal-metal-superconductor junctions 4 and for ballistic superconductor-ferromagnet-superconductor ͑SFS͒ junctions at the 0-transition. 5,6 The remaining second order coefficient I c ͑2͒ will result in a doubling of the frequency in the interference pattern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%