2010
DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000367632.45384.5a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Posterior Reduction and Fixation for the Treatment of Basilar Invagination With Atlantoaxial Dislocation

Abstract: The direct posterior distraction technique between occiput and C2 pedicle screws is an effective, simple, fast, and safe method for the treatment of BI with AAD. Transoral odontoidectomy and cervical traction for the treatment of BI with AAD should be reconsidered.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
96
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…39,44,59,104 Distraction may be conducted using instrumentation between the occipital bone plate/screws and C1-2 vertebral instrumentation or with distraction between C-1 and C-2 when C-1 is congenitally fused with the occiput (atlas assimilation or occipitalization of the atlas) to increase the distance between the clivus and odontoid, allowing reduction and/or reducing dislocation. 39,44,59,104 Others have used titanium spacers and bone graft to distract between the joints of C-1 and C-2 to treat basilar invagination. 29 Purely intraoperative posterior distraction techniques can be effective for reduction of mild and moderate cases of basilar invagination.…”
Section: Distraction Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39,44,59,104 Distraction may be conducted using instrumentation between the occipital bone plate/screws and C1-2 vertebral instrumentation or with distraction between C-1 and C-2 when C-1 is congenitally fused with the occiput (atlas assimilation or occipitalization of the atlas) to increase the distance between the clivus and odontoid, allowing reduction and/or reducing dislocation. 39,44,59,104 Others have used titanium spacers and bone graft to distract between the joints of C-1 and C-2 to treat basilar invagination. 29 Purely intraoperative posterior distraction techniques can be effective for reduction of mild and moderate cases of basilar invagination.…”
Section: Distraction Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reduction methods such as those of Goel, Jian, Wang, and others have been applied to make the odontoid process move downward and tilt forward. 1,6,10,11,22,25 Among them, the method of Jian is relatively simple and more familiar to us. Application of posterior reduction can effectively decompress the neuraxis and avoid the drawbacks of ventral decompression in selected cases with basilar invagination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,4,8,9,12,13,[16][17][18]21,23,[26][27][28][29] The other technique is posterior-only reduction, which could preserve the anatomical integrity of the craniovertebral junction and avoid the risks of anterior surgery in some cases. 1,6,10,11,22,25 In this paper we present our experience in a patient with basilar invagination treated successfully using endoscopic transnasal odontoidectomy combined with posterior reduction. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report using the 2 techniques in 1 surgical procedure to treat basilar invagination.…”
Section: ©Aans 2013mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5) The endoscopic transnasal approach does not need the soft palate splitting or the hard palate resection, thus minimising the risk of postoperative dysphonia or velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) [15,16,31]. In recent years, more aggressive posterior reduction including decompression, instrumentation, realignment and fusion has been used to treat basilar invagination, which reduced the need of anterior decompression [32][33][34][35][36]. We believe that the value of the anterior approach decompression can never be underestimated, although some patients may benefit from the posterior reduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%