2020
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202002876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Quantification of Heat Generation Due to Inelastic Scattering of Electrons Using a Nanocalorimeter

Abstract: Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is arguably the most important tool for atomic‐scale material characterization. A significant portion of the energy of transmitted electrons is transferred to the material under study through inelastic scattering, causing inadvertent damage via ionization, radiolysis, and heating. In particular, heat generation complicates TEM observations as the local temperature can affect material properties. Here, the heat generation due to electron irradiation is quantified using bot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electron beam-induced phenomena depend largely on the material under study but typically include sample heating, defect formation, phase transformation, charging, and ionization of the surrounding gases. Electron beam-induced changes in the local temperature are not trivial to quantify, and different approaches have been attempted to measure heat generation due to electron beam irradiation. Sample charging, due to the ejection of secondary, core, and Augur electrons, is another effect, which cannot be neglected in in situ E­(S)­TEM studies of electrodes, electrocatalysts, and catalytic redox reactions. , In these cases, the electron beam-induced potential can be in the order of the redox potential of the desired reaction and thus needs to be carefully addressed. Electron beam-induced atomic displacement, known as the knock-on damage, causes the formation of interstitials and vacancies inside the sample and can lead to structural changes such as nanoparticle reorientation, re-crystallization, enhancement of diffusional process, , and mechanical deformations .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electron beam-induced phenomena depend largely on the material under study but typically include sample heating, defect formation, phase transformation, charging, and ionization of the surrounding gases. Electron beam-induced changes in the local temperature are not trivial to quantify, and different approaches have been attempted to measure heat generation due to electron beam irradiation. Sample charging, due to the ejection of secondary, core, and Augur electrons, is another effect, which cannot be neglected in in situ E­(S)­TEM studies of electrodes, electrocatalysts, and catalytic redox reactions. , In these cases, the electron beam-induced potential can be in the order of the redox potential of the desired reaction and thus needs to be carefully addressed. Electron beam-induced atomic displacement, known as the knock-on damage, causes the formation of interstitials and vacancies inside the sample and can lead to structural changes such as nanoparticle reorientation, re-crystallization, enhancement of diffusional process, , and mechanical deformations .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last few decades, the characteristic length of electronic devices has shrunk significantly in order to improve their performance. Nevertheless, the self-heating effect generates tremendous heat, and is becoming one of the most important factors that restrict the in-depth reduction of the characteristic length [1][2][3][4][5]. In addition, the strong size effect and boundary effect at nano/microscale inhibit the transport capability of heat carriers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%