2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2006.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct, quantitative clinical assessment of hand function: Usefulness and reproducibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
21
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…VAS,46 52 ‘pain’ subscale scores of SF-3652 and SACRAH36 were not statistically different between groups (p>0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…VAS,46 52 ‘pain’ subscale scores of SF-3652 and SACRAH36 were not statistically different between groups (p>0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The Cochin index46 and SACRAH ‘function’ subscale scores36 were not statistically different in the two sets of patients (p>0.05). M-HAQ,52 which is less specific for assessing hand problems, was less affected in HOA than in RA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The accuracy and objectivity of hand function evaluation can be increased by introducing simple quantitative methods based on different parameters, such as ROM, gripping/pinch force, hand dexterity and posture, position and velocity of object grasped, etc. [31]. However, the relationship between these parameters and their relevance to functional ability remains to be elucidated through a systematic method for the objective and quantitative assessment of hand function that is able to reliably diagnose a patients' functional state and to document their response to therapy.…”
Section: Existing Clinical Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se ha encontrado que en los pitchers en edad de formación hay una relación directa entre la fuerza de prensión y la fuerza de pellizco de la mano dominante con la altura, la masa corporal, el IMC, la masa muscular de los miembros superiores, la masa libre de grasa y la masa grasa (17), proponiéndose la fuerza de prensión y de pellizco variables directamente relacionadas con el rendimiento del lanzamiento de béisbol (18). También se ha demostrado que los pitchers adolescentes consiguen una mayor velocidad en el lanzamiento cuanto mayor es su peso (19), talla o longitud de brazos (20), el volumen muscular global del cuerpo y el volumen muscular segmentario del miembro superior dominante y ambos miembros inferiores (17).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified