1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf01413075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct-reaction contributions to projectile-fragment spectra at 10?20 MeV/nucleon

Abstract: A direct-reaction model is employed to calculate projectile-fragmentation and transfer spectra for 15N and 12C which result (at the grazing angle) from bombardment of 2~ by 160, in the energy range between 140 and 315 MeV. The results are in approximate agreement with recent data of Gelbke et al. In the case of 15N, the spectral widths suggest a change in mechanism from transfer to fragmentation at about 18 MeV/nucleon; the 12C data are best fit by fragmentation throughout this energy range.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 12 On the other hand, a linear dependance of ~0 with energy is observed for the transfer products (those with ZF> Zproj-3) with quite lower widths as compared to the fragmentation channel even at energies as high as 44 MeV/u. As already pointed out by Mc Voy and Nemes [33], it is not surprising to get such large differences for the two processes. For a transfer reaction, the particle is transferred on a definite final state due to momentum conservations and it puts strong constraints, which do not exist in break-up reactions, on the available phase space.…”
Section: V1 Fragmentation and Transfermentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Figure 12 On the other hand, a linear dependance of ~0 with energy is observed for the transfer products (those with ZF> Zproj-3) with quite lower widths as compared to the fragmentation channel even at energies as high as 44 MeV/u. As already pointed out by Mc Voy and Nemes [33], it is not surprising to get such large differences for the two processes. For a transfer reaction, the particle is transferred on a definite final state due to momentum conservations and it puts strong constraints, which do not exist in break-up reactions, on the available phase space.…”
Section: V1 Fragmentation and Transfermentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, the observed value is quite consistent with experimental systematics (see [-6]). According to McVoy and Nemes [20] this finding indicates a break-up proceeding via transfer rather than by a fast abrasion. It has been pointed out [11] that a cutoff of the wave function at small distances due to the nuclear absorption effectively reduces the width go, since only the nuclear periphery is probed.…”
Section: Analysis Of Inclusive 6li Break-up Datamentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The same representation for all measured 24-27Mg isotopes for example shows a flat ~r 0 distribution close to 109 MeV/c at 3~ the % value increases slowly as one moves to backward angles. The strong change for a 0 values observed here for S isotopes can be regarded as an illustration of the direct reaction contribution to projectile fragmentation calculated by McVoy and Nemes [14]. They predict widths 50 ~o larger for fragmentation than for the direct process.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 83%