2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct reduction of graphene oxide films into highly conductive and flexible graphene films by hydrohalic acids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

33
961
6
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,518 publications
(1,006 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
33
961
6
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, reduction process was carried out by immersing the composite film into HI solution in a sealed cuvette and placed the cuvette in warm oil bath at 80 • C for 2 h. The reduction mechanism for GO to rGO using HI acid has been reported elsewhere. 33 The reduced composite film (black) was washed by water several times to remove the excessive HI, yielded a highly aligned but asymmetric and flexible film as shown in Figure 1d. Inset of Figure 1d shows flexibility of the composite film.…”
Section: Experimental Detailmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, reduction process was carried out by immersing the composite film into HI solution in a sealed cuvette and placed the cuvette in warm oil bath at 80 • C for 2 h. The reduction mechanism for GO to rGO using HI acid has been reported elsewhere. 33 The reduced composite film (black) was washed by water several times to remove the excessive HI, yielded a highly aligned but asymmetric and flexible film as shown in Figure 1d. Inset of Figure 1d shows flexibility of the composite film.…”
Section: Experimental Detailmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to date, chemically derived graphene oxide (GO) from graphite has revealed a variety of potential uses because of its flexibility and relatively cheap fabrication. Like a graphene precursor, a subsequent GO reduction could restore the sp 2 carbon structure via various methods such as annealing [4], solvothermal/hydrothermal processes [5][6][7], or different kinds of reductants [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. However, compared to mechanical exfoliation, functionalities (as defects) can be meanwhile imperfectly introduced onto graphene sheet surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, compared to mechanical exfoliation, functionalities (as defects) can be meanwhile imperfectly introduced onto graphene sheet surfaces. On the other hand, an oxygenation/reduction process confers on GO features that not only are relevant for applications in electrochemistry, such as hybrid materials [16], ultra-capacitors [3,17], transparent/conducting film [10,15,[18][19][20][21], battery electrodes [22], and sensors [23][24][25], but that also carry potential in the bioengineering arena. Hu et al reported that graphene-based 4 materials, i.e., GO or reduced GO paper, showed an excellent inhibitory effect on bacterial growth with mild cytotoxicity [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 ITO, however, suffers from several drawbacks that limit its viability as a TCE for next-generation optoelectronics, including high cost, poor performance on plastic substrates, and a tendency to crack when flexed. 2,3 Potential solution-processable alternatives to ITO include carbon nanotubes, 4,5 graphene, [6][7][8][9] conducting polymers, 10,11 and metal nanowires [12][13][14][15] Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (SWCNTs) are attractive TCE materials due to their high intrinsic conductivity and mechanical durability but, owing to large inter-tube resistances, their reported performance characteristics are significantly worse than ITO. The need for aggressive acid treatments to induce p-type doping of semiconducting tubes and the non-permanent nature of the doped state are also problematic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 The fabrication procedure however involved a combination of chemical vapour deposition (CVD), chemical etching, and solid-state transfer, and is unlikely to transfer easily to large-scale industrial use. Graphene TCEs may alternatively be prepared from a dispersion of graphene oxide, 6,7 which can be cast onto a substrate and then reduced to render it conductive. The reduction step, however, requires high temperatures and/or harsh reagents such as hydrazine and is consequently ill-suited to direct deposition on plastic substrates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%