2011
DOI: 10.1029/2010gb003938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct soil moisture controls of future global soil carbon changes: An important source of uncertainty

Abstract: The nature of the climate–carbon cycle feedback depends critically on the response of soil carbon to climate, including changes in moisture. However, soil moisture–carbon feedback responses have not been investigated thoroughly. Uncertainty in the response of soil carbon to soil moisture changes could arise from uncertainty in the relationship between soil moisture and heterotrophic respiration. We used twelve soil moisture–respiration functions (SMRFs) with a soil carbon model (RothC) and data from a coupled … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
153
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
(172 reference statements)
3
153
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between soil heterotrophic respiration rate and moisture content is a fundamental property for understanding and modeling organic carbon cycling in soils (Falloon et al 2011;Sierra et al 2015;Vincent et al 2006). Various experimental studies have been performed to understand mechanistic processes and factors controlling such a relationship (Franzluebbers 1999;Kakumanu et al 2013;Schjønning et al 1999;Vincent et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The relationship between soil heterotrophic respiration rate and moisture content is a fundamental property for understanding and modeling organic carbon cycling in soils (Falloon et al 2011;Sierra et al 2015;Vincent et al 2006). Various experimental studies have been performed to understand mechanistic processes and factors controlling such a relationship (Franzluebbers 1999;Kakumanu et al 2013;Schjønning et al 1999;Vincent et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) through changing the bioavailability of DOC. The different maximum respiration rates and HR-S curves observed in laboratories and field sites indicate that the relation between organic carbon transfer rate and water content changes with soils (Daly et al 2009;Falloon et al 2011;Skopp et al 1990).…”
Section: Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a better simulation of the ALT a higher vertical resolution and extended soil profile will be beneficial. Future model development should ensure a dynamic coupling of soil organic carbon content and soil thermal and hydraulic properties (Falloon et al, 2011), as well as allowing for sub-grid variability and uncertainty in soil properties. A separate peat module for JULES is already under development in order to study peatland carbon dynamics in the boreal zone, and work is underway to couple JULES to a more advanced model of carbon and nitrogen turnover in both mineral and organic soils (Smith et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a general agreement that soil microbial activity has an optimal value when the soil is wet (but not saturated) and decreases at when the soil becomes dry. The reduction in microbial biomass carbon in alternating wet-dry soils observed as from week 24 of incubation could be mostly attributed to water and oxygen limitation of microbial activity: as matric suction increases soil water is held in pores inaccessible to microbes [36]. High microbial biomass carbon under the continuously wet soil moisture in the shallow, wet and duplex at week 3 and 14 may be ascribed to the presence of large soil pore spaces as the soil associations had higher sand content (Table 1) so the organic matter was readily available the soil microbes hence they proliferated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%