1982
DOI: 10.1038/299081a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct structural localization of two toxin-recognition sites on an ACh receptor protein

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we cannot exclude the possibility of only partial occupancy of antibody in the available RyR1 binding sites because of the binding conditions and interference of the detergent at a relatively high concentration (ϳ0.4% CHAPS). A statistical analysis of the difference map shows that the regions with the highest t values (significance level Ͼ98%) are located within the areas of highest positive densities in the difference map, reinforcing their statistical significance (23)(24)(25). Two other smaller regions of positive differences are detected in the central portion of the channel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we cannot exclude the possibility of only partial occupancy of antibody in the available RyR1 binding sites because of the binding conditions and interference of the detergent at a relatively high concentration (ϳ0.4% CHAPS). A statistical analysis of the difference map shows that the regions with the highest t values (significance level Ͼ98%) are located within the areas of highest positive densities in the difference map, reinforcing their statistical significance (23)(24)(25). Two other smaller regions of positive differences are detected in the central portion of the channel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The differences were considered to be significant at the confidence level greater than 98% (i.e., random chance is Ͻ0.02) (23)(24)(25). and k obs is the slope obtained from a plot of ln(B e ͞(B e Ϫ B t )) where B e is the amount bound at equilibrium and B t is the amount bound at time t.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual subunits appeared as barrel staves surrounding the vestubule, and differences in electron densities within each subunit could be discerned. Assignment of subunit location was tentatively achieved using ␣-bungarotoxin and subunit-specific antibodies resolvable as new densities in the electron density maps (Zingsheim et al, 1982;Kubalek et al, 1987). From these studies, the two ␣-subunits were shown to be separated by another subunit, apparently the ␤-subunit, and the ␦-subunit, which covalently joined pairs of receptors, was shown not to be the subunit between the two ␣-subunits (reviewed by Karlin, 1987).…”
Section: Early Advances (1980s Through 1990s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evidence in support of this assertion is twofold : the high surface density of binding sites for the quasi-irreversible competitive antagonist a-bungarotoxin, and the equivalent coherent coverage of the membrane by the 7 -8-nm particles attributed to the receptor protein (see reviews in [1,2] and references therein). In spite of this high density and close packing of the receptor molecules, naturally occurring ordered arrays are rare (0.1 -1 in receptor-rich membranes [3]). The hexagonal outline observed in some electron micrographs of the receptor particles is a result of the local tight packing rather than a consequence, or reflection, of any internal symmetry feature [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of this high density and close packing of the receptor molecules, naturally occurring ordered arrays are rare (0.1 -1 in receptor-rich membranes [3]). The hexagonal outline observed in some electron micrographs of the receptor particles is a result of the local tight packing rather than a consequence, or reflection, of any internal symmetry feature [3]. This lack of crystalline order does not necessarily imply a random organization of the receptor in the membrane, and in fact we have shown [4] that the acetylcholine receptor particles do possess the ability to form oligomeric aggregates, in agreement with the observation of linear double or quadruple structures by freezeetching electron microscopy [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%