2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-006-0586-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct versus indirect effects of wave exposure as a structuring force on temperate cryptobenthic fish assemblages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…data). Direct and indirect influence of wave exposure on blennies has been reported in other areas (La Mesa & Vacchi 2005, Santin & Willis 2007 and on a breakwater near these study sites (Pizzolon et al, 2008), with a general tendency for higher abundance and richness on more exposed sites (La Mesa & Vacchi 2005, Pizzolon et al 2008). We did not find any difference in richness and abundance between our sites, nonetheless the observed differences in species composition may reflect species preferences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…data). Direct and indirect influence of wave exposure on blennies has been reported in other areas (La Mesa & Vacchi 2005, Santin & Willis 2007 and on a breakwater near these study sites (Pizzolon et al, 2008), with a general tendency for higher abundance and richness on more exposed sites (La Mesa & Vacchi 2005, Pizzolon et al 2008). We did not find any difference in richness and abundance between our sites, nonetheless the observed differences in species composition may reflect species preferences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Among the Mediterranean intertidal fishes, Blenniidae is the most speciose family, being represented by 16 species mainly occupying shallow coastal rocky substrates (Patzner 1985, Illich & Kotrschal 1990, La Mesa & Vacchi 2005, Orlando-Bonaca & Lipej 2007, Santin & Willis 2007, Froese & Pauly 2008, Pizzolon et al 2008. Blennies are benthic fish, often showing markedly strict depth preferences (Gibson 1972, Patzner 1985, Illich & Kotrschal 1990, Zander et al 1999, Faria & Almada 2006, Orlando-Bonaca & Lipej 2007, with intertidal species presenting morphological, physiological and behavioural adaptations to this environment (Laming et al 1982, Gonçalves & Almada 1998, Sayer 2005.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turbulent flow, reef fish spend a relatively large amount of time in flow energy refuges (Johansen et al 2007(Johansen et al , 2008. Others have examined the influences of wave motion on the swimming modes of fish assemblages , the composition of reef fish assemblages (Friedlander et al 2003, Fulton and Bellwood 2004, the zonation of prey species attributed to the negative effects of wave energy on benthic predators, especially sea stars, crabs, and spiny lobsters (Leonard et al 1998, Robles et al 2001, and the simultaneous direct (displacement) and indirect effects (habitat structuring) of wave exposure on the distribution and abundance of cryptobenthic reef fishes (Santin and Willis 2007). Here we provide the first quantitative estimates of the direct effects of velocity on individual performance of a prey species, while simultaneously estimating the concurrent indirect effects of waves and turbulence as forces that reduce predator abundance and feeding activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that the intertidal fish assemblage was comprised of a defined subset of subtidal species. The observed site differences in both subtidal and intertidal fish assemblages in Utría may be a consequence of the degree of wave exposure of the sites, as well as a function of small-scale differences in habitat (Santin & Willis 2007). Wave exposure has been suggested to be a major factor shaping the structure of fish communities (Fulton et al 2005), and although it was not measured in this study, is likely to affect the fish community structure of rocky and coral reef areas of the region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%