Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains

Wakiaga, J; Brunton, Paul; Silikas, Nick; Glenny, Anne‐Marie; Gopakumar, Ashish; Boyle, Liam

doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004347.pub3

Cited by 8 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several factors play a significant role in determining how long the reattached tooth fragment remains functional, such as the media used to store the tooth fragment after fracture, type of material used for adhesion, and the technique used for the reattachment procedure 22 . The veneer acts as a thin layer of a material covering the labial surface of a tooth and can be applied directly to the tooth, or by indirect methods 23 . The superiority of the fifth generation of dentin bonding agents compared with earlier generations has been shown in most studies 24 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of shear bond strengths with different bevel preparations for the reattachment of fractured fragments of maxillary central incisors

Ghoreishizadeh

Mohammadi

Rezayi

et al. 2020

Dental Traumatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/Aims: Fractures of anterior teeth are a highly prevalent form of dental trauma. Among the various treatment options, reattachment of the fractured part to the remaining tooth has a lot of advantages. The aim of this study was to compare different bevel preparation techniques when reattaching fractured fragments to maxillary central incisors. Methods: This study was performed on 52 maxillary central incisors that were randomly divided into 3 experimental groups and 1 control group. In the control group, the repair was done by attaching the fractured fragment using bonding and composite resin without any bevel preparation. In the second and third groups, the bevel preparation was done to a depth of 0.5 mm before attachment of the fragment on the palatal side of the fracture and on the labial and palatal sides, respectively. In the fourth group, after tooth preparation, a 0.5 mm composite veneer was placed on the labial surface. The amount of force needed to refracture the tooth was measured with a universal testing machine, and shear bond strength was calculated in MPa. Results: The mean and standard deviation (mean ± SD) of shear bond strengths in the control group were 81.48 ± 8.18 MPa. In the palatal bevel group, they were 97.74 ± 11.41 MPa; in the labial and palatal bevel group, 131.56 ± 9.25 MPa; and in the composite veneer group, 104.36 ± 5.50 MPa. Significant differences were observed between the groups, but there was no significant difference between the palatal bevel and composite veneer groups. Conclusions: Reattachment of the fractured fragments by all three methods increased the shear bond strength. The highest shear bond strength was obtained when both labial and palatal bevels were used.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of shear bond strengths with different bevel preparations for the reattachment of fractured fragments of maxillary central incisors

Ghoreishizadeh

Mohammadi

Rezayi

et al. 2020

Dental Traumatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, it has been used extensively in clinical practice (Wolff et al 2010) [  The composite veneer's main advantage is that it can be used directly, resulting in less chair time with an excellent initial aesthetic. However, composite veneers are more prone to discolouration and wear (Waki et al 2004) [50]. For better experience skill is required.…”

Section: Resin Compositementioning

confidence: 99%

Porcelain Veneers vs Composite Resin Veneers: A Review

Sailo¹,

Bathla²,

Thakur³

et al. 2020

JAMMR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The main concern for clinical dentistry is the rehabilitation of lost dental aesthetics. These days' people are more conscious of how they feel about their smiles and their effect on other people. Contemporarily based upon the patient's fascination, they are various procedures and material options to select. It is quite challenging for the dentist to satisfy the needs and keep within the patient's budget. The effect of preparation design and material type on the success of dental veneers is controversial. Usually, the clinician's preference decides the preparation geometry. Nevertheless, veneers with incisal coverage seem to have better aesthetic and more predictable outcomes, while having a chamfer finish line palatable seems to be unnecessary, and limiting the preparation to a butt-join finish line is more sensible. Composite veneers provide good aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction; however, due to its physical properties and bonding strength compared to porcelain veneers, composite veneers tend to fail significantly faster than porcelain veneers. Therefore, veneers have to compare, reviewed, and discussed in details. This review literature discusses the essential parameters.

show abstract

Esthetic Dentistry on Twitter: Benefits and Dangers

Salim

Jubair

Hassona

et al. 2021

International Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives. The demand for esthetic dentistry is growing, and social media constitute the main driving force behind this revolution. Twitter is a leading social media platform; however, there is a lack of research on the pattern of communications and the impact of Twitter on esthetic dentistry. The purpose of this study was to analyze the content of tweets related to esthetic dentistry and to investigate how Twitter has affected the perception of, and demand for, esthetic dentistry. Moreover, it aimed to assess the potential benefits and risks of esthetic dentistry advertising strategies on Twitter as a potential social media platform. Materials and Methods. Using a specialized web scrapping tool made available by the Python programming language, a total of 54,000 public tweets were downloaded from Twitter at real-time by matching specific keywords. The downloaded tweets were manually filtered, and 13,787 tweets were included and categorized into four tweet sets by content. Results. The main categories were tweets regarding specific cosmetic procedure, totaling 56.53% (43.2% for veneers, 13.3% for whitening), advertisements (36.72%), information (5.53%), and general cosmetic dentistry (1.22%). Negative opinions towards veneers and whitening were the most common themes (68.03% and 43.44%). For veneers, illegal use for kids was the most common negative theme (59.7%) and being destructive for whitening (86.3%). Positive opinions counted 6.26% of veneers and 4.3% of whitening tweets. Advertising for whitening products was the second most common between all tweets (16.6%), and advertising for dental practices was the third (14.7%). Presenting facilities/services was the most common marketing strategy for dental practices (49.7%). Twitter was weakly used to circulate educational content (5.5%) and to post reviews (0.75%). Conclusion. Twitter was extensively used to share experiences/opinions towards dental cosmetic interventions. Advertising is another vital use of this platform. However, circulating information was the least common use of this social media. Additionally, tweeters were rarely to post online reviews and specific advices and recommendations regarding esthetic dentistry. Moreover, females tended to participate and tweet more significantly in cosmetic-related topics than males. This platform should be tailored efficiently to target users’ priorities and to improve health literacy and self-care. Twitter was weakly used to circulate educational content according to this study and rarely used to share online reviews.

show abstract

Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains

Cited by 8 publications

References 7 publications

Comparison of shear bond strengths with different bevel preparations for the reattachment of fractured fragments of maxillary central incisors

Comparison of shear bond strengths with different bevel preparations for the reattachment of fractured fragments of maxillary central incisors

Porcelain Veneers vs Composite Resin Veneers: A Review

Esthetic Dentistry on Twitter: Benefits and Dangers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About