The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 This guideline also recommended that composite veneers were not generally used above the age of 16 as they tend to discolour and fracture more readily than porcelain. 18 However, a subsequent systematic review has concluded that there was insufficient evidence to produce a guideline. 18 Therefore, the choice of material for veneer use should be assessed on an individual patient basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17 This guideline also recommended that composite veneers were not generally used above the age of 16 as they tend to discolour and fracture more readily than porcelain. 18 However, a subsequent systematic review has concluded that there was insufficient evidence to produce a guideline. 18 Therefore, the choice of material for veneer use should be assessed on an individual patient basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 However, a subsequent systematic review has concluded that there was insufficient evidence to produce a guideline. 18 Therefore, the choice of material for veneer use should be assessed on an individual patient basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yengopal et al 2009 There was insufficient evidence from the 3 included trials to make any recommendations about which filling material to use for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition I 20. Wakiaga et al 2004 There is no reliable evidence to show a benefit of one type of veneer restoration (direct or indirect) over the other with regard to the longevity of the restoration I 21. Rickard et al 2004 Given the high risk of bias in the available studies and lack of consistency between different outcome measures, there is no reliable evidence that application of ozone gas to the surface of decayed teeth stops or reverses the decay process Fabbro et al 2007 There is currently scarce evidence for a sound decision-making process among alternative treatments for re-treatment of a periradicular pathosis I RCT, randomized controlled trial; QI, quality of evidence; I, inadequate; A, adequate.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%