2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7519(02)00015-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct visualisation of RNA editing within a Leishmania tarentolae mitochondrial extract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The peak Q2 fractions (13-15) contain z1/6000 of the original crude mitochondrial extract protein and exhibit a simpler protein pattern than the parental D and Q1 fractions. This extent of purification is consistent with others reported using similar protocols (Rusche et al 1997;Panigrahi et al 2001a;Oppegard and Connell 2002). There is at least an z10-fold further purification compared to the whole-cell protein content; however, the specific activity of editing complexes could not be calculated since the in vitro editing assay is not linear with protein added, particularly in cruder fractions (Rusche et al 1997;Panigrahi et al 2001a;Oppegard and Connell 2002;data FIGURE 2. p40, p50, p60, and p100 copurify with editing complexes after extensive ion-exchange chromatography.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The peak Q2 fractions (13-15) contain z1/6000 of the original crude mitochondrial extract protein and exhibit a simpler protein pattern than the parental D and Q1 fractions. This extent of purification is consistent with others reported using similar protocols (Rusche et al 1997;Panigrahi et al 2001a;Oppegard and Connell 2002). There is at least an z10-fold further purification compared to the whole-cell protein content; however, the specific activity of editing complexes could not be calculated since the in vitro editing assay is not linear with protein added, particularly in cruder fractions (Rusche et al 1997;Panigrahi et al 2001a;Oppegard and Connell 2002;data FIGURE 2. p40, p50, p60, and p100 copurify with editing complexes after extensive ion-exchange chromatography.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Likewise, the addition of a third potential guiding nucleotide (A-42) resulted in three U insertions (lanes 5,6). The guiding is significantly more precise than any other previously described gRNA-directed reaction that is catalyzed by mitochondrial extracts (Oppegard et al 2000;Kabb et al 2001;Oppegard and Connell 2002) or lysates (Byrne et al 1996;Kapushoc and Simpson 1999) prepared from L. tarentolae. Linear molecules, some of which are consistent with the size expected of editing reaction intermediates, are formed during the reaction, although other unrelated processes could also be producing these products.…”
Section: Pai Et Almentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It has been difficult to obtain an editing assay that is linear with the quantity of added extract in both the direct L. tarentolae (Oppegard and Connell 2002) and T. brucei (Rusche et al 1997;Panigrahi et al 2001a) in vitro assays. As illustrated in Figure 7, the editing assay using the in vitro selected A-1 RNA is linear with extract concentration over the range from 3% to 40% correctly edited product.…”
Section: In Vitro Editing Activity Increases With Increasing Amounts mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This secondary screen exploited a radiolabeled reporter that is based on the cytochrome b mRNA (Oppegard et al 2000;Oppegard and Connell 2002). The gRNA for the cytochrome b mRNA acts in trans, like the majority of natural gRNAs.…”
Section: Secondary Screens To Identify False Positivesmentioning
confidence: 99%