1993
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/26/8/011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directed polymers on trees: a martingale approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This estimate suggests that the field theory computations of the multifractal dimensions (with replicas, supersymmetry and Liouville field theory) are reliable [8] in the regime |e| < e c . Second, the entropy density for any GREM is known to be self-averaging in the thermodynamic limit [9][10][11][12] and in view of the close connection between GREM and our problem we expect this to be also true here.…”
Section: B |E| < Ecmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This estimate suggests that the field theory computations of the multifractal dimensions (with replicas, supersymmetry and Liouville field theory) are reliable [8] in the regime |e| < e c . Second, the entropy density for any GREM is known to be self-averaging in the thermodynamic limit [9][10][11][12] and in view of the close connection between GREM and our problem we expect this to be also true here.…”
Section: B |E| < Ecmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…[13], which is based on the analogy with the KPP equation and is a non rigorous one, and the approach of Ref. [14], which employs probability theory and is entirely satisfactory from the mathematical point of view. We would like to deal with this type of equation:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gibbs inequality tells us then that this average work is at least as large as ∆F = F 1 −F 0 , the increase in free energy. 9 The difference W 0 −∆F is due to the irreversible nature of the abrupt energy injection, and this irreversibility means an increase of the total entropy of the system and its environment, and so, the Gibbs' inequality is, in fact, a version of the second law of thermodynamics. This excess work beyond the free-energy increase, W 0 − ∆F , which can be thought of as the "dissipated work," can easily shown to be equal to kT · D(P 0 P 1 ), where P 0 and P 1 are the canonical distributions pertaining to E 0 and E 1 , respectively.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It turns out that this model is exactly solvable (in many ways) and one can show (see e.g., [9]) that it admits a glassy phase transition:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%