Alternative Lithographic Technologies IV 2012
DOI: 10.1117/12.917993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directed self-assembly defectivity assessment. Part II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2,4 As shown in Fig. 1(d), the relatively thick PS layer remains between the cylindrical PMMA domain and the bottom surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2,4 As shown in Fig. 1(d), the relatively thick PS layer remains between the cylindrical PMMA domain and the bottom surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…2 One of the remaining issues for these DSA processes is to reduce the defect level. 3,4 According to the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS), the defect level for the current DSA processes is still far from the manufacturing requirement. 5 The DSA hole shrink process which we have investigated in this study is implemented as follows (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DSA process takes advantage of the self-assembling properties of materials, such as block copolymers (BCP), to reach nanoscale dimensions while meeting the constraints of current manufacturing. Defectivity is one of the keys to implement DSA in manufacturing [3][4][5][6]. In this paper, we focus on DSA defectivity study of contact hole shrinkage, and wafer-level defectivity of DSA shrink at each stage of the DSA patterning was investigated (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annealing strategies that mitigate preferential top interface interactions have been developed that utilize solvent vapor, which both plasticizes the BCP to induce self-assembly and creates nonpreferential top interface interactions. 4 We view traditional thermal annealing as a highly preferable process because it is both compatible with technology widely utilized in industry today 5,6 and accesses thermodynamically minimum energy states. Control of the top interface is thus crucial to translate current thermal annealing processes to Si-BCPs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%