2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directed Technological Change in a Post-Keynesian Ecological Macromodel

Abstract: This paper presents a post-Keynesian ecological macro model that combines three strands of literature: the directed technological change mechanism developed in mainstream endogenous growth theory models, the ecological economic literature which highlights the role of green innovation and material flows, and the post-Keynesian school which provides a framework to deal with the demand side of the economy, financial flows, and inter-and intra-sectoral behavioral interactions. The model is stock-flow consistent an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While sticking to aggregate modelling, also scholars form the stock-flow consistent (SFC) tradition have contributed to the analysis of low-carbon transitions (Dafermos et al, 2017;Monasterolo and Raberto, 2018;Naqvi and Stockhammer, 2018;Carnevali et al, 2020), enhancing our understanding of the macrofinancial consequences of resource use, environmental depletion and movements in labour productivity and energy intensity (Rezai and Stagl, 2016). Notwithstanding fundamental differences in the modelling philosophy, it is worth stressing that both the agent-based and ecological macroeconomic literatures have historically adopted a dis-equilibrium interpretation of economic dynamics, with large emphasis on the role of innovation, investment and credit provision as destabilising yet fundamental ingredients of economic change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While sticking to aggregate modelling, also scholars form the stock-flow consistent (SFC) tradition have contributed to the analysis of low-carbon transitions (Dafermos et al, 2017;Monasterolo and Raberto, 2018;Naqvi and Stockhammer, 2018;Carnevali et al, 2020), enhancing our understanding of the macrofinancial consequences of resource use, environmental depletion and movements in labour productivity and energy intensity (Rezai and Stagl, 2016). Notwithstanding fundamental differences in the modelling philosophy, it is worth stressing that both the agent-based and ecological macroeconomic literatures have historically adopted a dis-equilibrium interpretation of economic dynamics, with large emphasis on the role of innovation, investment and credit provision as destabilising yet fundamental ingredients of economic change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The conditions for and impact of carbon pricing on the transition (Dafermos et al, 2017;Stolbova et al, 2018;Naqvi and Stockhammer, 2018;Bovari et al, 2018b);…”
Section: Climate Risks and Financial Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 See Caverzasi and Godin (2014), , and Nikiforos and Zezza (2017) for comprehensive surveys on the SFC approach to modeling. 5 See, e.g., Dafermos, Nikolaidi, and Galanis (2017), Ponta et al (2018), Bovari, Giraud, and Mc Isaac (2018), and Naqvi and Stockhammer (2018).…”
Section: Tradition Of Macro Modeling In Denmarkmentioning
confidence: 99%