2011
DOI: 10.1112/blms/bdr050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directional discrepancy in two dimensions

Abstract: In the present paper, we study the geometric discrepancy with respect to families of rotated rectangles. The well-known extremal cases are the axis-parallel rectangles (logarithmic discrepancy) and rectangles rotated in all possible directions (polynomial discrepancy). We study several intermediate situations: lacunary sequences of directions, lacunary sets of finite order, and sets with small Minkowski dimension. In each of these cases, extensions of a lemma due to Davenport allow us to construct appropriate … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result was extended to all finite sets Ω by Cassels [8] in 1956 (with some generalizations by Davenport [10] In their previous work [6] the authors of the present paper had made an attempt to understand this question in the case of infinite sets Ω. Obviously, it is too optimistic to expect the same estimates in this situation, hence ψ(q) in (1.1) has to be an increasing function whose nature depends on the geometry of Ω. Generalizing the methods of Cassels and Davenport, we have considered several particular classes of sets: lacunary sequences, lacunary sets of finite order (see §3.3 for the definition), and sets with small upper Minkowski dimension.…”
Section: Diophantine Approximation the Central Question Of This Invementioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This result was extended to all finite sets Ω by Cassels [8] in 1956 (with some generalizations by Davenport [10] In their previous work [6] the authors of the present paper had made an attempt to understand this question in the case of infinite sets Ω. Obviously, it is too optimistic to expect the same estimates in this situation, hence ψ(q) in (1.1) has to be an increasing function whose nature depends on the geometry of Ω. Generalizing the methods of Cassels and Davenport, we have considered several particular classes of sets: lacunary sequences, lacunary sets of finite order (see §3.3 for the definition), and sets with small upper Minkowski dimension.…”
Section: Diophantine Approximation the Central Question Of This Invementioning
confidence: 82%
“…For infinite rotation sets Ω one should anticipate the right-hand side to be somewhat smaller than 1/q 2 , which in turn would lead to larger discrepancy bounds depending on the geometry of Ω. Results of this type have been obtained in [6] for several particular examples of rotation sets.…”
Section: Diophantine Approximation the Central Question Of This Invementioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this context, we mention one construction of explicit point sets in dimension 2 which considers more general test sets. Namely the construction by Bilyk, Ma, Pipher, Spencer [8] where discrepancy with respect to certain rotated boxes is considered.…”
Section: Inverse Transformation and Test Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%